检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张廷海[1] 刘贺菊 ZHANG Ting-hai;LIU He-ju(Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu,Anhui,233030,China)
机构地区:[1]安徽财经大学,安徽蚌埠233030
出 处:《武汉商学院学报》2023年第6期67-73,共7页Journal of Wuhan Business University
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目《新型城镇化与城市产业结构优化:耦合机制、空间匹配效应与政策设计》(项目编号:71974002);教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目《新型城镇化背景下产城融合的演化机制、测度与政策协调研究》(项目编号:18YJA790109);安徽省哲学社会科学规划一般项目《乡村振兴视阈下产业扶贫与返贫治理机制研究》(项目编号:AHSKY2020D45);安徽财经大学研究生科研创新基金项目《新型城镇化背景下三次产业劳动力配置互动效应研究》(项目编号:ACYC2021219)。
摘 要:城乡发展是共同富裕的重要课题,而城镇化能够为农村人口提供创收机会,这是否对农村具有减贫效应、推动我国城乡共同富裕?为此,选取31省份2010—2020年的面板数据进行实证发现:城镇化发展对农村具有显著减贫效应,其中城镇化率超过37.22%时减少绝对贫困效果最佳,处于区间(40%,86.3%]时弱化相对贫困最佳,且城镇化的减贫效应存在地区异质性。目前,我国的城镇化水平已步入农村减贫的最佳区间,应适度控制城镇化发展速度,因地制宜搭建城乡融合平台,合力推进共同富裕。Urban and rural development is an important topic for achieving common prosperity.Urbanization can provide income-generating opportunities for the rural population.However,does it have a poverty reduction effect and promote the common prosperity of urban and rural areas in China?To answer this question,this study empirically analyzes the panel data of 31 provinces from 2010 to 2020.The findings reveal that urbanization has a significant poverty reduction effect on rural areas,in which the absolute poverty reduction effect is the best when the urbanization rate exceeds 37.22%,and the relative poverty reduction effect is the best when the urbanization rate is within the range(40%,86.3%],and that the poverty reduction effect of urbanization has regional heterogeneity.At present,China's urbanization level has entered the optimal range of rural poverty reduction.Therefore,it is recommended to appropriately control the pace of urbanization development,build platforms for urban-rural integration according to local conditions,and jointly promote common prosperity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.136.254