检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭丽萍[1] Guo Li-ping(School of Law,Guangxi Police College,Nanning 530028,China)
出 处:《政法学刊》2023年第6期29-36,共8页Journal of Political Science and Law
基 金:2022年广西高等学校千名中青年骨干教师培育计划人文社会科学类课题“行政拘留权扩张的相关法律问题研究”(2022QGRW062)。
摘 要:近年来,我国的治安拘留制度一直颇受学界关注和外界质疑。回顾制度发展史,我国治安管理处罚法中拘留条款设置较多是基于近现代违警法律制度的历史沿袭,治安拘留制度所发挥的功能始终聚焦于维护社会秩序和国家政治安全、惩处特定违法行为,以及保障罚款的有效执行。治安拘留制度未来的改革应坚持稳中求进,在现有制度之下可以通过构建相对独立的法制审核机制,实现对治安拘留的有效监督,从源头上减少执法隐患;与此同时,还应逐步嵌入与个人信用挂钩的新处罚种类替代治安拘留的部分功能,以适应时代发展的需要。In recent years,the system of public security detention in China has been concerned by academic circles and questioned by the outside world.Reviewing the history of the development of the system,the setting of detention clauses in China's public security administration punishment law is mostly based on the historical inheritance of the legal system of violating police regulations in modern times.The function of public security detention system has always focused on maintaining social order and national political security,punishing specific illegal acts,and ensuring the effective enforcement of fines.The future reform of the public security detention system should insist on making progress in the course of stability.Under the existing system,we can realize the effective supervision of public security detention and reduce the hidden danger of law enforcement from the source by constructing a relatively independent legal examination mechanism.At the same time,new types of penalties linked to personal credit should be gradually embedded to replace part of the functions of public security detention in order to meet the needs of the development of the times.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7