斯蒂格勒对马克思技术思想的吸纳与误读  

On Stiegler's Absorption and Misinterpretation of Marx's Thoughts on Technology

作　　者：刘日明[1] 陈芝敏 LIU Riming;CHEN Zhimin

机构地区：[1]同济大学人文学院哲学系,上海200092 [2]同济大学哲学系,上海200092

出　　处：《学术月刊》2024年第2期57-65,共9页Academic Monthly

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国式现代化蕴含的独特文明观研究”(23&ZD032)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：斯蒂格勒着眼于现时代人类的生存之痛,揭示了市场营销与精神工业的合谋状态及其后果,在新问题域即象征的贫困、文化的政治、精神的灾难三个层面与马克思的技术思想进行了对话。经由对人类生命外在化的新阶段的反思,斯蒂格勒以马克思关于机器技术所带来的无产阶级思想为核心,实现了对马克思技术之思的三次吸纳,构建了其关于劳动、生活和理论的知识皆丧失的普遍无产阶级化理论。在一般器官学视域中,斯蒂格勒对马克思技术思想的阐释存在着形式化应用的嫌疑,偏离了历史唯物主义,造成了对马克思的无产阶级思想和唯物辩证法的误读,陷入了技术决定论的窠臼。Focusing on today's human malaise,Stiegler revealed that the collusion between marketing and spiritual industry had brought about three new issues in people's spiritual life,i.e.symbolic misery,cultural politics and spiritual catastrophe.Based on these new issues,Stiegler had a dialogue with Marx's technological thoughts.Taking Marx's proletarian thoughts as the core,Stiegler has absorbed Marx's technological thoughts for three times and put forward his theory of generalized proletarianization about the loss of work,life and theory knowledge after he analyzed the new phase of human exteriorization.In the context of general organology,Stiegler formally applied Marx's technological thoughts and misinterpreted Marx's thoughts on proletariat and materialist dialectics due to his deviation from historical materialism,which made him stuck in a rut of technological determinism.

关 键 词：斯蒂格勒 马克思 精神工业 外在化 无产阶级化 

分 类 号：B0[哲学宗教—哲学理论]