机构地区:[1]山东大学经济学院,济南250100 [2]山东大学自贸区研究院专家咨询委员会
出 处:《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2024年第2期21-35,共15页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目“出口扩张与健康:理论分析与中国经验”(71903111);山东省重点研发计划(软科学项目)重大项目“数字经济促进山东省制造业绿色低碳高质量发展的内在机制及政策研究”(2023RZA02015);山东省社会科学规划研究项目“环境规制政策能否助力‘健康中国·健康山东’?——来自‘两控区’政策的证据”(19CQXJ16);山东省高等学校“青创团队计划”团队(2022RW002)。
摘 要:鲜有文献基于中国的微观数据探讨儒家文化如何影响家庭社会捐赠与共同富裕这一极具现实意义的话题。基于2010—2020年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)微观数据,采用各城市孔庙数量、清代进士人数和儒家书院数量等指标互为补充地衡量当地儒家文化浓厚程度,系统探究了儒家文化对家庭社会捐赠与共同富裕的影响作用。研究发现:(1)儒家文化对家庭社会捐赠具有显著的促进作用,具体表现为提升了家庭社会捐赠倾向并扩大了家庭社会捐赠规模。(2)潜在的影响机制分析发现,儒家文化通过提升主观幸福感、生活满意度和家国情怀促进了家庭社会捐赠。(3)异质性检验结果显示,儒家文化对家庭社会捐赠的影响作用在不同地区、不同家庭之间存在一定差异。(4)调节效应检验结果表明,贫富差距大会强化儒家文化对家庭社会捐赠的促进作用,而邻里效应和对外开放程度弱化了这一促进作用。(5)进一步研究发现,儒家文化通过促进家庭社会捐赠支出缓解了收入不平等程度、促进了共同富裕。因此,应当大力弘扬儒家文化、积极提升普惠金融发展质效、积极孵化培育慈善组织和不断提升医疗保险覆盖率。Few relevant studies focus on the ways that Confucian culture affect household social donation and common prosperity based on micro-data from China,which is of great practical significance. Based on the micro-data of China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) from 2010 to 2020, employing the number of Confucian temple, Jinshi in Qing Dynasty, and Confucian academy at the city level, which are complementary with each other, to measure the local prevalence of Confucian culture, this paper systematically explores the effect of Confucian culture on household social donation and common prosperity. Primary findings are as following: Firstly, Confucian culture significantly promotes household social donation, indicating that Confucian culture increases household social donation propensity and enlarges household social donation scale. Moreover, the coefficients of interest remain robust after various tests, including using alternative measures, controlling the potential interference from local other cultural trait, replacing the research sample, instrumental variable method, placebo test, etc. Secondly, the potential mechanism analysis finds that Confucian culture promotes household social donation through the channels of subjective well-being, life satisfaction, and the feelings of belonging to the nation. Thirdly, the heterogeneity test indicates that the impacts of Confucian culture on household social donation are heterogeneous across different regions and different kinds of household. Fourthly, moderating effect test shows that disparity between rich and poor strengthens the positive impact of Confucian culture on household social donation while neighborhood effect and the level of opening to the outside world weakens the positive impact of Confucian culture on household social donation. Fifthly, further study indicates that Confucian culture significantly reduces the degree of income inequality and promotes common prosperity by promoting household social donation. Finally, based on primary findings, we bring forward corresp
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...