中乌民法典人格权立法的比较研究与借鉴  

A Comparative Study of the Civil Code of China and Ukraine in Legislation of Personality Rights

作　　者：杨立新 YANG Lixin(School of Law,Guangdong University of Finance and Economics,Guangzhou 510320,Guangdong,China)

机构地区：[1]广东财经大学法学院,广东广州510320

出　　处：《扬州大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2024年第1期85-105,共21页Journal of Yangzhou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：北京市社会科学研究基金重点研究项目“民法典实施中的疑难问题研究”(21FXA004)。

摘　　要：中国《民法典》和《乌克兰民法典》不约而同地规定了人格权编(卷),展示了21世纪民法典的人文主义发展方向,更好地保护了人的尊严和享有的人格权。两国民法典的人格权立法都有自己的特点,也都存在各自的不足。中乌民法典对人格权的称谓有所不同;人格权在民法典中出现的位置不同,《乌克兰民法典》将某些属于公法的权利规定为人格权,这正是我国《民法典》所要避免的公权利与私权利不分的问题;在对人格权内容的具体规定上,两部民法典均有可相互借鉴之处。对两国民法典人格权立法进行比较研究,可以发现两国民法典人格权立法的共同特点,既可以增强我国立法的自信,也能够发现他国的优势和自身的不足,进而借鉴他国立法,完善我国的人格权立法,更好地保护我国民事主体的人格权和人格尊严。Both Chinese and Ukrainian Civil Codes coincidentally include the volume of Personality Rights,showing the humanistic development of the Civil Code in the 21st century for better protecting human dignity and personality rights.With their respective features,the legislation of personality rights in the two Civil Codes still has some deficiencies.A comparison shows that the two Codes have different names for personality rights,which are put in different positions of the Codes.Ukrainian Civil Codes put some rights belonging to the public law under the personality right.It is what our Civil Code must avoid:public rights and private rights must not be muddled up together.The two Codes can refer to each other in terms of the contents of personality rights.This comparative study can,on the one hand,reveal the shared features of the two Codes and,more importantly,help improve our legislation of personality rights by referring to the advantages of the counterpart laws.

关 键 词：中国民法典 乌克兰民法典 人格权立法 立法地位 立法内容 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]