农村宅基地有偿退出制度改革:试点经验、现实困境与政策建议——以安徽金寨和江西余江两地试点为例  

Rural Homestead Paid Withdrawal System Reform:Pilot Experience,Practical Difficulties and Policy Recommendations——a Case Study of Anhui Jinzhai County and Jiangxi Yujiang County

作　　者：黎平 梅智超 郭燕如 Li Ping;Mei Zhi chao;Guo Yanru(Jingdezhen Ceramic University,Jingdezhen 333403,Jiangxi,China)

机构地区：[1]景德镇陶瓷大学,江西景德镇333403

出　　处：《贵州省党校学报》2024年第1期92-105,共14页Journal of Guizhou Provincial Party School

基　　金：江西省高校人文科学研究规划项目“宅基地三权分置改革的政策目标、法理基础与规范体系”(项目批准号:FX19111)阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：农村宅基地有偿退出试点改革旨在破除制度路径依赖,盘活农村闲置资产。从安徽金寨和江西余江两地的试点观察中,不难看出,以行政主导调控为模块构成的金寨模式和以内生主体自治为模块构成的余江样板均取得显著成果,但其供给后发驱动不足、标准价值分类简化、保障衔接机制弱化、盘活利用效果欠佳等困局是影响两地农村宅基地有偿退出试点良性循环的发展桎梏。在推进农村宅基地有偿退出试点进程中,应当以供给多元化、标准规范化、保障同步化、盘活体系化作为破局措施,架构出一套凸显农民主体地位、疏通市场参与通道、健全财政兜底保障三位一体的宅基地有偿退出新机制。The pilot reform of paid withdrawal of rural homestead is aimed at breaking the dependence of system path and demonstrating the value liquidity of rural idle assets.From the pilot observation of Jinzhai in Anhui Province and Yujiang in Jiangxi Province,it is not difficult to see that the Jinzhai model composed of administration-led regulation module and Yujiang model composed of endogenous subject autonomy module have achieved remarkable results.However,the lack of latecomer driving supply,simplification of standard value classification,weakening of security linkage mechanism and poor utilization effect are the development shackles that affect the virtuous cycle of paid withdrawal of rural housing land in the two places.In the process of promoting the pilot process of paid withdrawal of rural housing land,we should follow the breaking dimension of supply diversification,standard standardization,guarantee synchronization,and systematization,and construct a new mechanism of paid withdrawal of rural housing land,which shows farmers'main position,dregs the channels of market participation,and perfect the trinity of financial guarantee.

关 键 词：农村宅基地制度 有偿退出 农村土地制度改革 

分 类 号：F321.1[经济管理—产业经济]