论“一‘是’到底论”及其意义  

On"the Thorough Understanding of Being in the Sense of Copula"and Its Significance

作　　者：王路[1,2] Wang Lu

机构地区：[1]郑州大学哲学学院 [2]清华大学人文学院哲学系

出　　处：《哲学研究》2024年第1期87-96,126,共11页Philosophical Research

摘　　要：陈康、贺麟、熊伟等众多哲学前辈对“being”一词提出不同翻译和理解,包括“是”“有”“在”等,这表明了他们对“存在”这一译语的态度,认识到这一译法有问题。然而,尽管前辈提出“是”并谈论“是”的翻译,但是他们的观点不能被称为一“是”到底论。采用和谈论“是”的翻译与一“是”到底论还是有根本性区别的。前辈的工作表现出哲学研究的进步,也体现出质疑、批判和进取精神。应该充分认识前辈工作的意义和价值,继承和发扬前辈的批判精神。同时也应该认识到,一“是”到底论是对前辈工作的继续和发展,是哲学研究的进步,因而是有意义的。Chen Kang,He Lin,Xiong Wei and many other predecessors have put forward different understandings as well as translations of the term"being",which include"shi"(being in the sense of copula),"you(there be)and"zai"(somewhere).This choice of terminology indicates their reservations about translating being into"cunzai"(in the sense of existence)out of a recognition that this translation is problematic.However,although these predecessors did propose""shi"and talk about the translation of"shi",their stance cannot be called"the thorough understanding of being in the sense of copula".After all,there is a fundamental difference between adopting and discussing the translation of"shi"on the one hand and"the thorough understanding of being in the sense of copula"on the other hand.The work of our predecessors demonstrates a progress in philosophical research and a spirit of questioning,criticizing as well as enterprising.The significance and value of their work should be fully recognized,while their critical spirit be inherited and carried forward.We must also realize that"the thorough understanding of being in the sense of copula"not only constitutes a continuation and development of our predecessors'work but also marks an advancement in philosophical research,which is therefore of considerable significance to philosophical studies today.

关 键 词：一“是”到底论 系词 有 在 是 

分 类 号：B01[哲学宗教—哲学理论]