刑法视阈下重罪案件的认罪认罚从宽规制反思  

Reflection on the Regulation of Leniency of Guilty Plea in Felony Cases under the Criminal Law

作　　者：李德胜[1] Li Desheng

机构地区：[1]北京市大兴区人民检察院第八检察部

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第1期8-13,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：认罪认罚从宽是兼具实体和程序的综合性法律制度,要实现制度的预期规制价值,亟需强化实体法供给支撑。司法解释性文件对认罪认罚的程序应用进行了系统规范,但在认罪认罚的实践类型和案件轻重未充分理清的情况下,既有的从宽规制过于原则和灵活,重罪案件如何实现从宽处罚的制度激励更是面临考验。刑法评价领域,认罪认罚从宽与坦白、自首的内在关系如何,是否存在重叠评价问题亟需明确。要破解认罪认罚从宽的刑法规制供给不足问题,需在理清认罪认罚实践类型与案件类型的基础上,立足于刑法裁量中从宽处罚的阶梯设置,结合不同类型认罪认罚背后行为人的人身危险性和预防矫正必要性,做出从轻、减轻或免除处罚的相应规定。Leniency of guilty plea is a comprehensive legal system with both entity and procedure.In order to realize the expected regulatory value of the system,it is urgent to strengthen the support of substantive law.The judicial explanatory documents have systematically standardized the application of the procedure of guilty plea,but in the case of the practice type of guilty plea and the severity of the case are not fully clarified,the existing leniency regulation is too principled and flexible,and how to achieve the institutional incentive of leniency in felony cases faces the test.In the field of criminal law evaluation,it is urgent to clarify the internal relationship between leniency of guilty plea and confession and surrender,and whether there is overlapping evaluation.In order to solve the problem of insufficient supply of criminal law regulation for leniency of guilty plea,it is necessary to clarify the practice types and case types of guilty plea on the basis of the ladder setting of lenient punishment in criminal law,combine with the personal danger of the perpetrators behind different types of guilty plea and the necessity of prevention and correction,and make corresponding provisions for leniency,reduction or exemption of punishment.

关 键 词：认罪认罚 制度激励 从宽处罚 刑罚裁量 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]