程序性辩护理论分类新论  

The New Discussion on the Classification of Procedural Defense Theory

作　　者：罗子超 Luo Zichao

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2024年第1期77-85,共9页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

基　　金：2020年度教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“被害人权利保护视域下的亲告罪刑事政策研究”的阶段性成果,项目编号:20YJC820043。

摘　　要：当前学界对于程序性辩护的既有分类在周延性和全面性方面存在不足。以程序性辩护权的行使程序作为分类标准,具有体系指引性、功能完整性和程序参与性三大优势。依照这一分类标准,可以区分出行政式程序性辩护、类诉讼式程序性辩护、诉讼式程序性辩护三种具体类型。在新的分类理论视角下,三种程序性辩护类型呈现出合理分布的差序格局,并在不同诉讼阶段具有明确的程序完善和阶梯式衔接方向,从而为立法机关改进制度和辩护律师从事辩护提供指引。The existing classification of procedural defense in current academic circles has shortcomings in terms of duration and comprehensiveness.Taking the procedure of the exercise of procedural defense right as the classification standard,it has three advantages:system guidance,functional integrity and procedural participation.According to this classification standard,three specific types of administrative procedural defense,litigation-like procedural defense and litigation-like procedural defense can be distinguished.From the perspective of the new classification theory,the three types of procedural defense show a reasonable distribution pattern,and have a clear direction of procedural perfection and step connection in different litigation stages,so as to provide guidance for the legislative organs to improve the system and defense lawyers to engage in defense.

关 键 词：程序性辩护 分类理论 行政式程序性辩护 类诉讼式程序性辩护 诉讼式程序性辩护 

分 类 号：D922[政治法律—法学]