检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李晨 LI Chen(Department of Politics and Law,Party School of the Central Committee of CPC(National Academy of Governance),Beijing 100091)
机构地区:[1]中共中央党校[国家行政学院]政治和法律教研部,北京100091
出 处:《楚雄师范学院学报》2024年第1期60-66,共7页Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
摘 要:近代中国形成“富强为体,宪制为用”范式的文化起点是刻画在中国传统中的实用主义。急功近利的实用主义是中国宪制文化展现出的基本品格。近代先进的中国人在谋求建立宪制的过程中,假定了“宪制为因,富强为果”的逻辑关系,这种假定的背后存在自由主义和集体主义的思维分歧。宪制与富强之间既存在内在价值上的冲突,也可以在国家面临内忧外患的情形下融汇。在没有宪制文化积淀的情况下,对宪制进行“截取”般的利用是难以成功的,故培育宪制文化成为历史留给当前宪制建设的重要启示。其中,对富强含义进行新的解读尤为必要。In modern China,the cultural starting point of the“prosperity as the body,constitutional system as the application”paradigm is pragmatism in Chinese tradition.The pragmatism of seeking quick success and instant benefits is a fundamental character exhibited in the Chinese constitutional culture.In modern times,advanced Chinese people,in their pursuit of establishing a constitutional system,assumed a logical relationship of“constitutional system as the cause and prosperity as the result”.Behind this assumption lies a divergence of thinking between liberalism and collectivism.There is an inherent value conflict between constitutionalism and prosperity,but it can also be integrated in situations where the country is facing internal and external troubles.Without the accumulation of constitutional culture,rough utilization of constitutional system is difficult to succeed,so cultivating constitutional culture has become an important inspiration left by history to the current constitutional construction.It is particularly necessary to provide a new interpretation of the meaning of prosperity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13