检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘捷云 孙超丰 许南瑜 凌远理[2] 刘青连[2] 郭鹏娟[2] 夏芳芳 PAN Jieyun;SUN Chaofeng;XU Nanyu;LING Yuanli;LIU Qinglian;GUO Pengjuan;XIA Fangfang(Community Health Service Center of Haizhu District Jiangnan Zhong Street,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510250,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]广州市海珠区江南中街社区卫生服务中心,广东广州510250 [2]广州市海珠区疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《医学动物防制》2024年第3期307-309,共3页Journal of Medical Pest Control
基 金:广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(A2018208);广州市卫生和计划生育科技西医类重大项目(20191A031005)。
摘 要:目的 比较环境卫生治理和化学灭蚊对蚊媒密度的控制效果,为有效防治登革热提供科学依据。方法 收集2020年广州市海珠区老旧城区试点的布雷图指数(breteau index, BI)、成蚊密度指数(adult mosquito density index, ADI)、标准间指数(standard space index, SSI)和诱蚊诱卵器指数(mosquito ovitrap index, MOI)原始数据,根据以上蚊媒指标进行蚊媒密度风险分级,对环境卫生治理组、化学灭蚊组干预后的蚊媒密度的风险等级数据资料进行卡方检验。结果 干预期后,环境卫生治理组与对照组蚊媒密度风险等级分布差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=11.14,P<0.05),化学灭蚊组与对照组蚊媒密度风险等级分布差异无统计学意义(χ^(2)=1.57,P>0.05),环境卫生治理组与化学灭蚊组蚊媒密度风险等级分布差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=6.94,P<0.05)。结论 环境卫生治理干预措施对降低蚊媒密度具有持续性效果,能达到有效防控登革热的目标。Objective To compare the control effects of environmental sanitation management and chemical mosquito control on mosquito vector density,and to provide a scientific basis for effective prevention and control of dengue fever.Methods The original data of breteau index(BI),adult mosquito density index(ADI),standard space index(SSI)and mosquito ovitrap index(MOI)were collected from Haizhu old district pilot in Guangzhou City in 2020.Risk classification of mosquito vector density was carried out according to the above mosquito vector indicators,and Chi-square test was carried out on the risk class data of mosquito vector density after the intervention of environmental sanitation management group and chemical mosquito control group.Results After the intervention period,the dfference in risk class distribution of mosquito vector density between the environmental sanitation management group and the control group was statistically significant(x^(2)=11.14,P<0.05),while the difference in risk class distribution of mosquito vector density between the chemical mosquito control group and the control group was not statistically significant(x^(2)=1.57,P>0.05),and the difference in risk class distribution of mosquito vector density between the environmental sanitation management group and the chemical mosquito control group was statistically significant(x^(2)=6.94,P<0.05).Conclusion Environmental sanitation management interventions have a sustained effect on reducing mosquito vector density and can achieve the goal of effective prevention and control of dengue fever.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.56