检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:仇华飞[1] 涂明辉 Qiu Huafei;Tu Minghui(School of Political Science & International Relations,Tongji University)
机构地区:[1]同济大学政治与国际关系学院
出 处:《国际关系研究》2024年第1期19-40,M0003,M0004,共24页Journal of International Relations
基 金:2020年国家社会科学基金重大研究专项(项目编号:20VGQ001)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:由于制度重叠,全球公共卫生治理领域的规范碰撞现象日渐显著,突发性公共卫生危机加剧了规范碰撞的强度。本文以建构主义范式中的规范为理论基点,通过梳理建构主义视角下规范的建构、传播、碰撞以及变迁过程,发现世界卫生组织与《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》在贫困国家民众的药品可及性问题上存在明显的规范碰撞现象,致使公共卫生治理领域的规范更加偏重贸易利益。研究认为,全球公共卫生治理领域的规范出现了进步,已经开始由利益至上向生命至上方向转变,这种转变在几次流行性传染病危机的推动下呈加速趋势。Due to the overlapping institutions,the normative collision in the field of global public health governance has become increasingly prominent,and the sudden public health crisis has intensified the intensity of the normative collision.Taking the norms in the constructivism paradigm as the theoretical basis,by combining the construction,dissemination,collision and change process of norms from the perspective of constructivism,and taking the WHO and TRIPS Agreement as an example,it is found that there are obvious normative collision phenomena between the WHO and TRIPS Agreement in the field of global public health governance,mainly reflected in the accessibility of medicines for people in poor countries.This collision has made norms in the field of public health governance more weighted towards trade interests.However,the norms in the field of global public health governance have made progress,and have begun to change from the interest first to the life first direction,and this change is accelerating under the promotion of several pandemic infectious disease crises.
关 键 词:规范碰撞 卫生治理 制度重叠 世界贸易组织 TRIPS协议
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.177