后殖民视角下的欧里庇得斯批评史与古典学术话语流变  

A Postcolonial Perspective on the Critical History of Euripides and the Evolution of Classical Discourse

作　　者：王瑞雪 Wang Ruixue(the Liberal Arts College,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]中山大学博雅学院

出　　处：《外国文学研究》2024年第1期87-104,共18页Foreign Literature Studies

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“欧里庇得斯与阿里斯托芬的文学关系研究”(2022M722793);国家社会科学基金重大项目“‘希腊化’时期文学经典文献翻译与研究”(22&ZD293)。

摘　　要：古希腊悲剧家欧里庇得斯的批评阐释历程深度参与了西方从殖民主义到后殖民主义的认识论变化。重新审视西方古典学术对于欧里庇得斯剧中的希腊身份及其文化他者的研究,将为殖民主义意识形态的批判提供有效的古典维度。首先,欧里庇得斯在东方主义话语的发展中呈现出多样的面相;其次,欧里庇得斯批评中的希腊人与“野蛮人”问题与古典学术话语的变革持续相关。这些学术批评中的诗学话语实践,尤其是对希腊性、人性、普遍性等概念的反思,体现了后现代西方文化之重构的一个侧面。欧里庇得斯悲剧的批评接受中的悖谬表征着后殖民与后现代文化生态之困境,也反映了多元文化语境中的文化赋值之难题。回观这一历程未完成的问题也有助于我们当下研究的主体性视角及文化身份的重思。The criticism and interpretation of the ancient Greek tragedian,Euripides,has been deeply involved in the Western epistemological evolution from colonialism to postcolonialism.Re-examining the Western classical studies on the Greek identity and its cultural other in Euripides’plays may provide an effective classical dimension for the critique of colonial ideology.First,Euripides shows his various facets in the development of the Orientalist discourse;second,the issue of the Greeks and“barbarians”in Euripidean criticism is consistently related to the transformation of classical academic discourse.The discursive practice of poetics in these criticisms,especially its reflection on the notions of Greekness,humanity,and universality,reveals an aspect of the reconstruction of Western culture in postmodern times.The ambivalence and paradoxes in the critical reception of Euripidean tragedy represent the impasse of postcolonial and postmodern cultural ecologies and the problem of valorization of cultures in a multicultural context as well.Looking back at the unresolved issues in this process will also help us reconsider the subjective perspective and cultural identity in our current research.

关 键 词：欧里庇得斯 后殖民 西方古典学术 “希腊性” 多元文化 

分 类 号：I545.073[文学—其他各国文学] J805[艺术—戏剧戏曲]