敦煌医药写本P.4038与羽043草书考辨五则  

On some UnclearCharacters in Cursive Script in Dunnuan Medical Manu-script P.4038and Haneda

作　　者：吴昌政 WU Chang-zheng

机构地区：[1]浙江大学汉语史研究中心/文学院,浙江杭州310058

出　　处：《古汉语研究》2024年第1期36-47,126,127,共14页Research in Ancient Chinese Language

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“东汉至唐朝出土文献汉语用字研究”(21&ZD295)。

摘　　要：法藏敦煌写本P.4038与日藏敦煌写本羽043的形制、内容、体例及字迹相类,原本当属同一件医药文书。目前学界对其校录注释已相对完善,但由于原卷多以行草书写就,部分字形简省难辨,加之敦煌医药文献语言成分复杂,诸家校释仍有可商可补之处。文章综合字形与文意文例,联系相关出土与传世文献,对其中“■”“■”“■”“■”“■”等疑难字形进行考辨分析,指出这两件医药写本在汉字史与汉语词汇史研究上的价值,并就涉及的草书写本校释问题试作讨论。Dunhuang Manuscript P.4038 and Haneda 043 share similarities in their form,content,format and handwriting,suggesting that they were originally parts of the same medical manuscript.While scholars have made significant progress in interpreting the texts,there are still some challenging characters and words that require further discussion.This article provides explanations for some unclear characters,emphasizing the value of these two medical manuscripts in studying the development history of Chinese language and writing.Additionally,it aims to discuss some issues related to the interpretation of cursive-script manuscripts.

关 键 词：敦煌写本 医药文献 P.4038 羽043 草书 

分 类 号：H123[语言文字—汉语]