检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪振江[1,2] 吴匡政 WANG Zhenjiang;WU Kuangzheng
机构地区:[1]兰州大学民法典研究院 [2]兰州大学法学院,甘肃730000
出 处:《北华大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第1期110-122,154,155,共15页Journal of Beihua University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“治理整顿背景下网络借贷机构退出机制研究”(20STA046)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:NFT因其存于网络数字空间,具虚拟性、可支配性、排他性等属性,应被认定为一种新形态的网络虚拟财产。基于学理视角下的主观权利论与现实环境下的租值耗散因素等考虑,理应适用虚拟财产理论中的权利范式,但由于现阶段虚拟财产规制并无明确法律依据,且权利范式存在客体依赖等困境,故对于NFT虚拟财产保护的研究应放弃路径依赖,以功能主义范式弥合形式主义范式带来的固有困境。通过目的分析与价值衡量等手段,可将NFT财产权利转化为法定财产权利边界的解释问题,以回应对NFT虚拟财产权利保护的需要。NFT should be recognized as a new form of network virtual property due to its existence in the digital space of the internet,with attributes such as virtuality,availability and exclusivity.Based on the theory of subjective rights from the perspective of academic theory and the factors of rent dissipation in the real environment,the rights paradigm in the theory of virtual property should be applied.However,due to the lack of clear legal basis for the regulation of virtual property at present,and the dilemma of object dependence in the rights paradigm,the research on the protection of NFT virtual property should abandon path dependence and use a functionalist paradigm to bridge the inherent difficulties brought by the formalist paradigm.By means of purpose analysis and value measurement,the interpretation of the boundary between NFT property rights and statutory property rights is addressed in response to the need for the protection of NFT virtual property rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.62