检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴瑶瑶[1,2] Wu Yaoyao
机构地区:[1]武汉大学哲学学院 [2]河南财经政法大学素质教育中心
出 处:《四川师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第2期52-58,200,共8页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:决策论的研究都采用“理性人”假设作为前提,以理性主义作为理论基础。这种强调理性决策,忽视情绪的决策理论不能很好地解释和指导实际的决策过程。行为决策的三种研究范式中,标准化决策范式否认情绪对决策的影响,认为可测量的“偏好”能帮人们作出“效用”极大化的选择;描述性决策范式开始关注到情绪在决策中的作用,提出的后悔理论、失望理论以及主观预期愉悦理论详细描述了决策过程中的认知、思维及其心理过程的作用;进化论决策范式从生态理性出发,认为情绪、经验以及内隐认知在人类决策行为中起着极重要作用。情绪在决策过程中的运行机制有两种主流看法:一种认为情绪是作为决策过程的一种驱动机制;一种认为情绪是作为进化过程中的一种适应机制而作用于决策过程。这两种机制对于决策过程都是重要的,但不足以充分说明情绪作用于决策过程的复杂性和互动性。情绪作为一种功能状态,在与大脑、身体和环境的共同作用中,帮助我们综合运用认知、理性思维和情绪能力,通过生成性机制作用于决策过程。Research in decision theory typically employs the assumption of the rational actor as a premise, with rationalism as its theoretical foundation. This emphasis on rational decision-making, while neglecting the role of emotions, fails to adequately explain and guide actual decision-making processes. Among the three research paradigms in behavioral decision-making, the normative decision-making paradigm negates the influence of emotions on decisions, asserting that measurable preferences can help individuals make choices that maximize utility;the descriptive decision-making paradigm begins to focus on the role of emotions in decision-making, with theories such as regret theory, disappointment theory, and subjective expected utility theory elaborating on the role of cognition, thinking, and psychological processes in the decision-making process;the evolutionary decision-making paradigm, starting from ecological rationality, argues that emotions, experiences, and implicit cognition play a crucial role in human decision-making behavior. There are two mainstream views on the operating mechanism of emotions in the decision-making process: one views emotions as a driving mechanism of the decision-making process, while the other sees emotions as an adaptive mechanism in the evolutionary process that influences the decision-making process. Both of these mechanisms are important for the decision-making process, but they are not sufficient to fully explain the complexity and interactivity of emotions in decision-making. Emotions, as a functional state, help to integrate cognitive, rational thinking, and emotional abilities through generative mechanisms in decision-making processes, within the collective influence of the brain, body, and environment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222