一流本科专业建设点遴选机制优化及建设成效评估思考——以汉语国际教育专业为例  

Optimization of the Selection Mechanism for First-Class Undergraduate Major Construction Sites and Evaluation of Construction Results: A Case Study of Chinese International Education Major

作　　者：龚漫 Gong Man

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学国际教育学院

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第2期154-160,207,共8页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金2017年度重大招标项目“汉语国际传播动态数据库建设及发展监测研究”(17ZDA306)的研究成果。

摘　　要：一流本科专业建设点遴选机制和建设成效评估是影响“双万计划”能否达到提升高校本科人才培养能力和质量预期目标的重要因素。以汉语国际教育专业为例,对一流本科专业建设点遴选机制进行研究后发现:其遴选标准笼统,实际操作中难以把握;分“赛道”建设与突出示范领跑两条建设原则存在矛盾;评审机制存在不足。优化遴选机制可有三条路径:一是明确关键指标,建立各专业建设点的遴选标准;二是分“赛道”择优改为统一标准择优;三是将“一次性大同行”会议评审改为“匿名通讯+小同行”会议评审。为提高建设成效评估的科学性,建议延长一流本科专业建设周期,构建以人才培养质量和特色为评估重点的“双核心”建设成效评估体系。The optimization of the selection mechanism for first-class undergraduate major construction sites and the evaluation of construction results are critical factors influencing whether the “Double First-Class Initiative” can achieve the expected goals of enhancing the talent cultivation capacity and quality of undergraduate education in universities. Taking the Chinese International Education major as an example, a study on the selection mechanism for first-class undergraduate major construction sites reveals several key findings: the selection criteria are too general, making it difficult to implement in practice;there is a contradiction between the principles of “track-based” construction and exemplary leadership;and deficiencies exist in the evaluation mechanism. Three possible pathways for optimizing the selection mechanism are proposed: firstly, clarifying key indicators and establishing selection criteria for each major construction site;secondly, transitioning from selecting based on different “tracks” to a unified standard selection process;and thirdly, replacing the traditional review process from one-time peer evaluation to anonymous communication review together with peer evaluation. To enhance the scientific assessment of construction effectiveness, it is recommended to extend the construction period of first-class undergraduate majors and establish a dual-core evaluation system focusing on talent cultivation quality and characteristics.

关 键 词：“双万计划” 遴选机制 建设成效评估 汉语国际教育 一流本科专业 

分 类 号：H195[语言文字—汉语]