检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓红英 DENG Hongying(Zhongnan University of Economics and Law)
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学马克思主义学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《边界与海洋研究》2024年第1期81-94,共14页Journal of Boundary and Ocean Studies
基 金:2022年度国家社会科学基金冷门绝学专项项目(22VJXG020)阶段性成果。
摘 要:印度军方最初的中印边界战争失败记忆是极其苦涩的,这种记忆既来自于战场上人员死伤被俘、军事溃败逃亡等恐慌体验,也源于印度国内各界批评、嘲弄、追责等屈辱感受。随着印度国内政治形势和社会氛围的变化,印度军方开始重构战争记忆,竭力塑造战争受害者身份和英勇抵抗者形象。印度军方的战争记忆既推动了印度的国防建设和安全体制改革,也在印度社会得到了一定程度的认同和传承。然而,印度军方的战争记忆长期遭受异议和质疑,存在接受程度有限问题。The Indian military's memory of the failure of the China-Indian border war in 1962 was extremely bitter.There were not only panic experiences such as death,injury,capture on the battlefield and military defeat and flight,but also humiliating feelings such as criticism,ridicule and accountability from the Indian public.With the changes in the domestic political situation and social atmosphere in India,the Indian military began to reconstruct the war memory,trying to create the identity of war victims and the image of heroic resistance.The war memory of the Indian military had not only promoted India's security reform and China policy adjustment,but also been recognized and inherited in Indian society to a certain extent.However,the Indian military's war memory had also been facing doubts and objections,and there was a problem of limited acceptance.
分 类 号:D822.335.1[政治法律—政治学] E351[政治法律—外交学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117