Effect of resistance training volume on body adiposity,metabolic risk,and inflammation in postmenopausal and older females:Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials  

作　　者：Paulo Ricardo Prado Nunes Pamela Castro-e-Souza Anselmo Alves de Oliveira Bruno de Freitas Camilo Gislaine Cristina-Souza Lucio Marques Vieira-Souza Marcelo Augusto da Silva Carneiro 

机构地区：[1]Department of Body and Human Movement,Minas Gerais State University(UEMG),37902-092 Passos,MG,Brazil [2]University Center of Planalto de Araxa(UNIARAXA),38180-129 Araxa,MG,Brazil [3]Physical Activity,Health and Ageing Research Group(GPASE),Minas Gerais State University(UEMG),37902-092 Passos,MG,Brazil [4]Exercise and Nutrition Research Group(GPEN),Minas Gerais State University(UEMG),37902-092 Passos,MG,Brazil [5]Sport Sciences and Physical Exercise Study and Research Group(GEPCEEX),Minas Gerais State University(UEMG),37902-092 Passos,MG,Brazil [6]Metabolism,Nutrition and Exercise Laboratory,Physical Education and Sport Center,Londrina State University(UEL),86050-070 Londrina,PR,Brazil [7]Postgraduate Program in Physical Education,Federal University of Sergipe(UFS),49107-230 Sao Cristovao,SE,Brazil

出　　处：《Journal of Sport and Health Science》2024年第2期145-159,共15页运动与健康科学（英文）

基　　金：supported by the Minas Gerais State University (UEMG/Brazil);a Research Productivity Scholarship Program (UEMG-PQ08/2021);a doctorate scholarship from the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq/Brazil-Process140473/2020-3);a doctorate scholarship fromthe Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES/Brazil-Code 001)。

摘　　要：Purpose:This meta-analytical study aimed to explore the effects of resistance training(RT) volume on body adiposity,metabolic risk,and inflammation in postmenopausal and older females.Methods:A systematic search was performed for randomized controlled trials in PubMed,Scopus,Web of Science,and SciELO.Randomized controlled trials with postmenopausal and older females that compared RT effects on body adiposity,metabolic risk,and inflammation with a control group(CG) were included.Independent reviewers selected the studies,extracted the data,and performed the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence(Grading of Recommendations,Assessment,Development,and Evaluation(GRADE)) evaluations.Total body and abdominal adiposity,blood lipids,glucose,and C-reactive protein were included for meta-analysis.A random-effects model,standardized mean difference(Hedges’ g),and 95% confidence interval(95%CI) were used for meta-analysis.Results:Twenty randomized controlled trials(overall risk of bias:some concerns;GRADE:low to very low) with overweight/obese postmenopausal and older females were included.RT groups were divided into low-volume RT(LVRT,~44 sets/week) and high-volume RT(HVRT,~77 sets/week).Both RT groups presented improved body adiposity,metabolic risk,and inflammation when compared to CG.However,HVRT demonstrated higher effect sizes than LVRT for glucose(HVRT=-1.19;95%CI:-1.63 to-0.74;LVRT=-0.78;95%CI:-1.15 to-0.41) and C-reactive protein(HVRT=-1.00;95%CI:-1.32 to-0.67;LVRT=-0.34;95%CI,-0.63 to-0.04)) when compared to CG.Conclusion:Compared to CG,HVRT protocols elicit greater improvements in metabolic risk and inflammation outcomes than LVRT in overweight/obese postmenopausal and older females.

关 键 词：C-reactive protein Fat mass Lipid profile MENOPAUSE Strength training 

分 类 号：G804.2[文化科学—运动人体科学]