“轻罪”理论研究中若干观点的商榷  

Discussion on Several Perspectives in the Research of"Misdemeanor"Theory

作　　者：汪明亮[1] WANG Mingliang(Fudan University,Shanghai 200433)

机构地区：[1]复旦大学法学院

出　　处：《犯罪研究》2023年第6期2-8,共7页Chinese Criminology Review

基　　金：2019年国家社科基金重大项目“污染环境犯罪多元治理机制研究”(项目编号:19ZDA160)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：理论界关于“轻罪”的研究成果斐然且意义重大,但若干观点科学性不足,值得商榷。支持“‘轻罪时代’选择以宽为主刑事政策”建议的前提条件不真实,必须严格贯彻宽严相济刑事政策;支持“应该废除醉驾型危险驾驶罪”建议的理由不合逻辑,对待危险驾驶罪,宜改良而非革命;“刑罚轻缓化是世界刑法发展趋势”论断与刑法发展实践不相符,需要考虑刑罚严厉化的现实意义;“犯罪化有违刑法谦抑性”论断过于片面,刑法谦抑性的核心在于刑法的最后手段性,而非刑法的排除性。The research results on"misdemeanor"in the theoretical community are remarkable and significant,but some viewpoints lack scientific validity and are worthy of discussion.The prerequisite for supporting the suggestion of choosing a lenient criminal policy in the era of misdemeanor is not true,and the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity must be strictly implemented.The reason for supporting the suggestion of abol⁃ishing the crime of drunk driving and dangerous driving is illogical.It is advisable to improve rather than revo⁃lutionize the treatment of dangerous driving crimes.The statement that"lenient punishment is a trend in the development of criminal law in the world"is inconsistent with the practice of criminal law development,and the practical significance of severe punishment needs to be considered.The statement that"criminalization violates the modesty of criminal law"is too one⁃sided.The core of the modesty of criminal law lies in its nature of being the last resort rather than its exclusivity.

关 键 词：科学性 轻罪时代 危险驾驶罪 刑罚轻缓化 犯罪化 刑法谦抑性 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]