下级法院报请提级管辖机制之司法现状审视及完善路径——以“动态管辖调整”与“法定管辖例外”为理论基点  

The Examination of Judicial Status Quo and Improvement Path of the Lower Court's Requesting Mechanism for Elevated Jurisdiction——Taking“Dynamic Jurisdiction Adjustment”and“Legal Jurisdiction Exception”as the Theoretical Basis

作　　者：石魏[1] 王伟娜 SHI Wei;WANG Wei-na

机构地区：[1]北京市东城区人民法院,北京100007 [2]北京市高级人民法院刑二庭,北京100022

出　　处：《北方论丛》2024年第2期62-71,共10页The Northern Forum

摘　　要：下级法院报请是当前提级管辖案件的主要来源。探讨下级法院报请提级管辖机制,其表层意义在于阐释“动态管辖调整”与“法定管辖例外”的发生机理,即为何需要在法定管辖及静态管辖之外,设置“动态”及“弹性”等更具灵活性的规则;其深层意义在于通过我国审级架构中“平行式柱型结构”向“金字塔体系布局”调整的路径,让各级法院深入理解裁判文书所具有的规则意义、政策效应及利益衡量价值。但实践中,受认知受限、规定抽象原则、配套机制阙如三方面因素制约,下级法院报请提级管辖面临适用标准宽严无序、裁判文书格式不统一等问题,严重影响提级管辖机制适用性、有效性。对此,为充分发挥提级管辖机制效能,首先,要结合案件要素对提级管辖案件适用标准予以明确;其次,从关键环节入手,细化提级管辖运行流程;最后,以考核激励机制为导向,充分发挥提级管辖案件的示范价值。ion principles and lack of supporting mechanisms,lower court’s reporting mechanism for elevated jurisdiction are faced with problems such as lax and disorderly application standards and inconsistent format of judgment documents,which seriously affect the applicability and effectiveness of the mechanism for elevated jurisdiction.In this regard,in order to give full play to the effectiveness of the mechanism for elevated jurisdiction,first of all,it is necessary to clarify the applicable standards for cases with elevated jurisdiction in combination with the elements of cases;Secondly,from the key links,refine the operation process of upgrading jurisdiction;Finally,we should give full play to the demonstration value of elevated jurisdiction of cases with the guidance of the examination and incentive mechanism.

关 键 词：提级管辖 动态调整 流程设置 “三景”路径 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]