企业合规刑法立法的反思与转进  

Reflection and Advance of Enterprise Compliance Criminal Law Legislation

作　　者：杨二慧 胡继恒 Yang Erhui;Hu Jiheng(Hubei University of Police,Wuhan 430034,China;The People's Procuratorate of Shuangliu,Chengdu 610200,China)

机构地区：[1]湖北警官学院学报编辑部,湖北武汉430034 [2]四川省成都市双流区人民检察院,四川成都610200

出　　处：《湖北警官学院学报》2024年第1期116-125,共10页Journal of Hubei University of Police

基　　金：社会治安治理研究中心2023年一般项目“网络暴力犯罪协同治理模式研究”(2023B014);教育部人文社会科学青年基金资助项目“总体国家安全观视域下网络犯罪协同治理模式研究”(23YJC820002)。

摘　　要：作为新型企业犯罪治理模式,刑事合规创造性地提出了合作共治的新理念。应当说,刑事合规的勃兴与责任主体统一性的苛求和犯意考察上的宽松紧密相关。我国单位犯罪在归责逻辑、罪过要求以及量刑机制等方面与国外存在明显的差异,故刑事合规的引入需要清除这些理论分歧。从刑事立法的角度而言:其一,修改单位犯罪,将特定成员刑事责任推定为单位责任;其二,将是否制定合规计划作为量刑的考察因素;其三,增设单位缓刑和职业禁止。As a new enterprise crime governance model,criminal compliance creatively put forward a new concept of cooperation and common governance.The flourishing of criminal compliance is closely related to the strict requirement of the unity of the subject of responsibility and the lax investigation of criminal intention.Compared with foreign countries,there are obvious differences in the imputation logic,fault requirements and sentencing mechanism of unit crimes in China,so the introduction of criminal compliance needs to remove the theoretical obstacles mentioned above.From the Angle of criminal legislation:First,amend the unit crime,the criminal responsibility of specific members is presumed to be the unit responsibility;Second,whether to make compliance plan as a factor of sentencing;Third,add unit probation and occupational prohibition.

关 键 词：企业合规 刑事立法 合规计划 单位责任 量刑依据 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]