检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑万腾 赵红岩[2] 仲颖佳 ZHENG Wanteng;ZHAO Hongyan;ZHONG Yingjia(School of Management,Jiangsu University,Zhenjiang 212013,China;Glorious Sun School of Business and Management,Donghua University,Shanghai 200051,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏大学管理学院,江苏镇江212013 [2]东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海200051
出 处:《运筹与管理》2024年第1期151-157,共7页Operations Research and Management Science
基 金:上海市哲学社会科学规划一般项目(2021BGL001);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目;东华大学研究生创新基金项目(CUSF-DH-D-2021066)。
摘 要:本文利用中国2003—2018年30省份面板统计数据,采用动态固定效应模型、SYS-GMM模型和中介效应模型实证考察国际技术溢出对中国绿色创新绩效的影响。研究发现:国际技术溢出能显著提升中国绿色创新绩效,但存在渠道差异,其中OFDI技术溢出驱动功效最强,其次是FDI技术溢出和进口贸易技术溢出。同时,这种驱动功效还存在区域和自主研发支出异质性,OFDI和FDI技术溢出对中西部地区绿色创新绩效的驱动功效更强,而进口贸易技术溢出高效赋能东部地区绿色创新绩效提升,且在较高自主研发支出的区域,国际技术溢出驱动功效更强。此外,国际技术溢出能通过引导创新生态要素耦合协调间接驱动中国绿色创新绩效提升。研究结论表明需要重视创新生态要素耦合协调发展,根据区域特点布局国际技术溢出渠道,持续发挥国际技术溢出驱动中国绿色创新绩效提升的长效机制。Faced with many challenges brought about by the deterioration of the ecological environment,building a green innovation system and driving comprehensive green transformation are the long-term strategy for sustainable development of the Chinese economy.However,the current green innovation performance in China relatively lags behind,and the fundamental reason is that China’s independent innovation foundation is weak,the green innovation model is not coordinated with economic development,and the technology blockade in Europe and America has led China into the dilemma of“low-end lock in”green technology.With the steady advancement of the“going out”and“bringing in”strategies,China’s outward foreign direct investment(OFDI),absorption of foreign direct investment(FDI),and import trade have shown a rapid growth trend,undoubtedly opening up the international channel for China’s green technology introduction,forming effective factor flow,knowledge diffusion,and technology spillover.In an open economic environment,besides independent research and development to improve green innovation performance,another important way for China is to absorb and utilize international technology spillovers,which is a more cost-effective path for green innovation transformation.So,can international technology spillovers drive the improvement of China’s green innovation performance?Are there any differences in the driving effects of different channels?In addition,China’s green innovation is a systematic ecological innovation model that balances social,economic,and environmental benefits,striving to achieve coupling and coordination of ecological elements such as innovation communities,innovation resources,and technological environment.Generally speaking,international technological elements diffuse and spill over to innovation entities such as Chinese enterprises,universities,and research and development institutions through channels such as investment and trade,strengthening technology transfer and knowledge exchange,and
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38