检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶宁 Ye Ning(Fujian Provincial Education Examinations Authority,Fuzhou 350003)
机构地区:[1]福建省教育考试院,福州350003
出 处:《西部学刊》2024年第5期73-76,共4页Journal of Western
摘 要:教育行政处罚设定权作为一项立法权,其权力来源由宪法、法律、法规以及规章进行严格限制,但在立法与司法实践过程中,教育行政处罚设定权存在超出立法限制而受到合法性质疑的情况。为了达到教育行政处罚设定权规范化的目的,需要从教育立法系统性、法律位阶调整以及事后评估三方面对教育行政处罚设定权进行规范,从而进一步完善我国教育法律体系建设。The setting power of educational administrative penalties,as a legislative power,is strictly limited by the Constitution,laws,regulations,and rules.However,in the process of legislation and judicial practice,the setting power of educational administrative penalties may be questioned for its legitimacy due to exceeding legislative limitations.In order to achieve the standardization of the setting power of educational administrative penalties,it is necessary to regulate the setting power of educational administrative penalties from three aspects:the systematic nature of educational legislation,the adjustment of legal positions,and post evaluation,in order to further improve the construction of China’s educational legal system.
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38