法学教育理论与实践脱节论的三重逻辑反思  

Disjointed Theory:A Logical Reflection on the Problems of Current Legal Education Reform

作　　者：何跃军[1] 陈淋淋 何雨泽 HE Yuejun;CHEN Linlin;HE Yuze(Law School,Ningbo University,Ningbo 31521l,China)

机构地区：[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《宁波大学学报（教育科学版）》2024年第2期38-46,共9页Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)

基　　金：浙江省课程思政教学研究项目“法学专业课程思政的系统推进路径研究”(浙教函[2022]51号);宁波大学重点教研项目“双创教育融入法学院法律人才培养体系的改革研究”(JYXMXZD201903)。

摘　　要：应新时代全面依法治国的实践要求,新一轮法学教育改革正在紧张酝酿中,改什么与怎么改成为关键问题。目前法学界在改革的主要问题上形成了理论与实践脱节的观点。本文再度深入反思上述观点,追问其逻辑证立问题。通过三重逻辑反思,认为法学教育中的理论性并未被充分挖掘和讲授,理论与实践的脱节是正常现象,理论与实践是一种“貌离神合”的关系;法学教育中理论联系实践与理论联系实际是不同的,理论联系实际的难度要远小于理论联系实践,应鼓励教师理论联系实际。通过对脱节论的三重逻辑反思,可以发现理论与实践在法学教育中既不能偏废,也不能过度强调,只有真正将“理论与实践有效结合”才是未来法学教育综合改革的可靠出发点与方向。A new round of legal education reform is underway,being focused on what and how to renovate as key logical issues to meet the practical needs of China's comprehensive rule of law in the new era.A"disjointed theory"has been developed around the separation of theory and practice in the academic circle of law studies.This article tried to consider the research on the theory to justify the logical issues concerned from the perspective of triple logic.It believed that the theoretical nature in law education has not been fully explored and taught,that the disconnection between theory and practice is a normal phenomenon,and that the relationship between theory and practice is"a separation of appearances and likeness in nature".It argued that the connection of theory and practice is different from that of theory and reality,and that it is far more difficult to integrate theory with practice than integrating theory with reality.This triple logical reflection on the disjunction theory thus emphasized that teachers can be encouraged to integrate theory with reality,and that theory and practice can neither be neglected nor overemphasized in law education.

关 键 词：法学教育改革 脱节论 逻辑反思 

分 类 号：G642[文化科学—高等教育学]