组态视角下减污降碳政策工具对环境规制效率的驱动机制——基于中国30个省份的fsQCA实证分析  

The driving mechanism of pollution and carbon reduction policy instruments on environmental regulation efficiency under the grouping perspective ——Empirical analysis of fsQCA based on 30 provinces in China

作　　者：孙钰[1,2] 宋雪瑶 马建辉[3] 齐艳芬[1] 姚鹏 SUN Yu;SONG Xueyao;MA Jianhui;QI Yanfen;YAO Peng(School of Public Administration,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China;Department of Management and Economics,Tianjin University,Tianjin 300072,China;School of Economics,Hebei University,Baoding 071000,China;School of International Education Cooperation,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China)

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学公共管理学院,天津300134 [2]天津大学管理与经济学部,天津300072 [3]河北大学经济学院,河北保定071000 [4]天津商业大学国际教育合作学院,天津300134

出　　处：《资源开发与市场》2024年第3期355-365,共11页Resource Development & Market

基　　金：2023年天津市哲学社会科学规划资助青年基金项目(编号:TJYJQN23-005)。

摘　　要：减污降碳是环境规制效率提升的标志,是实现污染控制和环境质量改善的重要抓手和突破口,探究减污降碳政策工具驱动环境规制效率提升的内在机理,对于推进“双碳”目标实现具有重要意义。以2012—2022年中国30个省份数据为研究对象,借助模糊集定性比较分析法(fsQCA)探析命令控制型、市场激励型和自愿参与型政策工具促进环境规制效率提升的多元路径组合。结果发现:减污降碳政策工具在提升全国环境规制效率方面呈现4种组合模式,且分别与中国东、中、西部地区的实施效果相匹配,未来将呈现多元政策工具组合协同发力的态势;命令控制型政策工具在提升中西部地区环境规制效率中发挥主导作用,中部地区尤为明显;自愿参与型工具则更多依赖命令控制型、市场激励型工具发挥政策组合作用,在西部地区发挥效力较弱。不同的环境规制效率驱动效果会带来差异化的政策工具组合,以此为不同地区提供政策建议。Reduction of pollution and carbon emissions,which symbolize the improvement of environmental regulation efficiency,and is a crucial levers and breakthrough in achieving pollution control and environmental improvements.Exploring the internal mechanism of the improvement of environmental regulation efficiency driven by reduction of pollution and carbon emissions policy tools is of great importance to achieve“Dual carbon”targets.This paper took the data of 30 provinces in China from 2012 to 2022 as the research object,and analyzed the multiple path combinations of command-and-control,market-incentive,and voluntary-participation policy instruments to promote the efficiency of environmental regulation with the help of fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis(fsQCA).The results showed that:There were four combinations to improve the environmental regulation efficiency,and the same role had been played in the eastern,central and western areas in China,which would show a synergistic effect of multiple policy instruments in the future.Command control played a dominant role in enhancing the environmental regulation efficiency in the central and western region,especially in the central region;Social-will were more dependent on command control and market incentive instruments,and less effective in the western region.Different efficiency-driven effects of environmental regulation leaded to a differentiated mix of policy instruments as a way of providing policy recommendations for different regions.

关 键 词：减污降碳 政策工具 环境规制效率 模糊集定性比较分析 

分 类 号：X32[环境科学与工程—环境工程]