论国际海运温室气体减排的市场措施方案  

Research on proposals of market-based measures for international shipping greenhouse gas emission reduction

作　　者：徐国平[1] 潘欣竹 XU Guoping;PAN Xinzhu(School of Law,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)

机构地区：[1]上海海事大学法学院,上海201306

出　　处：《上海海事大学学报》2024年第1期111-118,共8页Journal of Shanghai Maritime University

摘　　要：为对国际海事组织(International Maritime Organization,IMO)正在讨论的国际海运温室气体减排的市场措施方案进行评判,通过分析归类的方法,将各种方案划分为税费机制类方案、排放交易机制类方案、混合机制类方案等3类。借鉴IMO专家组在前期讨论中提出的多项评价标准,从便利监管、实施效果、“共同但有区别的责任(Common But Differentiated Responsibilities,CBDR)”原则的落实等3个方面对这些方案进行评价。得出以税费为基础的混合机制类方案具有一定优势,我国提出的方案相对更加契合各项评价标准。In order to assess the proposals of market-based measures for reduction of greenhouse gas(GHG)emission from international shipping that are currently being considered by International Maritime Organization(IMO),using the methods of analysis and classification,these proposals are divided into three categories:levy/fee-related mechanism proposals,emission trading mechanism proposals,and hybrid mechanism proposals.Referring to the multiple criteria of evaluation proposed by IMO expert group in the preliminary discussion,these proposals are evaluated in terms of the convenience of supervision,the effect of implementation,and the application of the principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities(CBDR).It is concluded that the levy/fee-based hybrid mechanism proposals have certain advantages,and the proposal from China is relatively more compatible with the evaluation criteria.

关 键 词：国际海运 温室气体减排 市场措施 评价标准 

分 类 号：D996.9[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] D993.5[政治法律—经济法学]