检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜志淳[1] 沈臻懿[1] DU Zhichun;SHEN Zhenyi(Criminal Justice College,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2024年第1期12-17,共6页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:华东政法大学2022年上海市课程思政示范课程建设项目。
摘 要:2005年,全国人民代表大会常务委员会通过的《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》(以下简称《决定》)作为司法鉴定领域内唯一的专门法律性文件,其颁布与实施初步实现了统一司法鉴定管理体制。但随着目前法治的进步及司法鉴定领域出现的诸多问题亟需法律予以规制,司法鉴定立法再次成为关注焦点。司法鉴定立法不仅面临着《决定》制定中遗留的老问题,亦交织着《决定》施行后衍生的新问题。需要在已有制度运行基础上,对司法鉴定立法涉及的重大问题展开深入研究,分别从宏观、中观和微观层面来予以探讨,以期能够逐渐形成具有系统性、前瞻性和相对成熟性的立法共识。The Decision on the Management of Forensic Appraisal(hereinafter referred to as the Decision)passed by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress in 2005,as the only specialized law in the field of forensic appraisal,has promulgated and implemented a unified forensic appraisal management system.However,with the progress of the rule of law and many new situations in the field of forensic appraisal,the legislation of forensic appraisal has once again become the focus of attention.The legislation of forensic appraisal is not only facing with the old problems left over from the formulation of the Decision,but also with new problems derived from the implementation of the Decision.On the basis of the operation of the existing system,it is necessary to conduct in-depth research on the major issues involved in the legislation of forensic appraisal,respectively from the macro,meso and micro levels,so as to gradually form a systematic,forward-looking and relatively mature legislative consensus.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7