检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄兰雁 HUANG Lanyan(Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Justice,Shanghai 200030,China)
机构地区:[1]上海市司法局,上海200030
出 处:《体育科研》2024年第2期41-47,59,共8页Sport Science Research
摘 要:随着体育运动的全民化、商业化、全球化,越来越多的人参与到体育活动中,引发了各种矛盾纠纷。体育纠纷的主体多元、类型多样,不同的纠纷解决机制各有利弊,需要综合运用调解、体育组织内部纠纷解决、仲裁、诉讼等方式解决体育纠纷。新修订的《体育法》建立了体育仲裁基本制度,填补了长期以来体育仲裁制度缺失的空白,但体育仲裁与商事仲裁、劳动仲裁之间的关系以及仲裁制度与其他纠纷解决机制的衔接还不够,需要理顺不同纠纷解决机制的关系,建立互相衔接、有机协调的多元纠纷化解机制。With the popularization,commercialization and globalization of sports,more and more people are involved in sports activities,which lead to various conflicts and disputes.Sports disputes have multiple subjects and various types,and different dispute settlement mechanisms have their own advantages and disadvantages.It is necessary to solve sports disputes by using mediation,internal dispute settlement of sports organizations,arbitration,litigation and other means.The newly revised Sports Law establishes the basic system of sports arbitration,filling a longstanding gap in the absence of a sports arbitration system.However,the relationship between sports arbitration and commercial arbitration,labor arbitration,as well as the connection between the arbitration system and other dispute settlement mechanisms is not yet well-connected.Therefore,it is necessary to clarify the relationship between different dispute settlement mechanisms and establish an interlinked and well-coordinated diverse dispute resolution mechanism.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7