公共转移支付对家庭消费相对剥夺的影响  

The Impact of Public Transfers on the Relative Deprivation of Household Consumption

作　　者：解垩[1] 高梦桃 XIE E;GAO Mengtao(School of Economics,Shandong University,Jinan Shandong 250100,China)

机构地区：[1]山东大学经济学院,山东济南250100

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学学报》2024年第2期40-51,共12页Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“共同富裕视角下培育内生动力解决相对贫困的长效机制研究”(23VRC035);国家自然科学基金项目“相对贫困的财税治理研究”(72073081)。

摘　　要：本文基于中国家庭追踪调查数据(CFPS),运用双向固定效应模型,实证考察公共转移支付对家庭消费相对剥夺的影响及作用机理。研究发现,公共转移支付可以显著缓解家庭消费相对剥夺。经过一系列稳健性检验并缓解潜在的内生性问题后,研究结论依然成立。异质性分析表明,相比于民生性转移支付,生产性转移支付显著缓解了家庭消费相对剥夺;公共转移支付对贫困县和高抚养比家庭的消费相对剥夺影响更大。机制分析表明,公共转移支付主要通过降低家庭收入相对剥夺、改善收入不确定性和提高社会信任水平来缓解家庭消费相对剥夺。本研究为缓解个体消费相对剥夺、改善居民福利水平,进而实现共同富裕提供了微观证据。Based on the Chinese Family Panel Studies(CFPS),this paper empirically examines the impact of public transfers on the relative deprivation of household consumption and the mechanism using a two-way fixed effects model.The results indicate that public transfers can significantly alleviate household consumption relative deprivation,and the findings remain valid after a series of robustness tests and alleviating potential endogeneity problems.Heterogeneity results reveals that productive transfers significantly alleviate household consumption relative deprivation compared to livelihood transfers;public transfers have a greater impact on consumption relative deprivation in poor counties and households with high dependency ratios.Mechanism tests suggest that public transfers alleviate household consumption relative deprivation by reducing household income relative deprivation,improving income uncertainty and increasing the level of social trust.This study provides micro evidence for alleviating the relative deprivation of individual consumption,improving the welfare level of residents,and realizing common prosperity.

关 键 词：公共转移支付 消费相对剥夺 收入相对剥夺 收入不确定 社会信任 

分 类 号：F810.45[经济管理—财政学]