检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄倩倩[1] HUANG Qianqian(The Second Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University,Suzhou 215004,China)
出 处:《现代医院》2024年第3期329-332,共4页Modern Hospitals
基 金:国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所医疗质量循证管理持续改进研究重点项目(YLZLXZ22K017);江苏省医院协会医院管理创新研究课题(JSYGY-3-2023-487)。
摘 要:目的进一步优化完善我国技术治理体系的路径,破解技术治理的困境,为创新技术治理、优化技术自治提供具体思路。方法阐述我国医疗技术治理困境,单纯的去行政化未能够充分激活医疗机构技术治理的自觉和自治的活力;分析困境背后可能的原因。结果治理困境主要有自治难、监督弱、创新少;分析其相应原因为意识不足、专业壁垒、结构性张力。结论从三方面探索医疗技术治理体系路径:用自主权激活自治权、用技术治理促进技术创新、建立多元主体的治理体系。将技术治理的重心下沉至基层各级医疗机构,回应群众的医疗需求才是技术治理的理想样态。Objective Further optimize and improve the path of China s technological governance system,solve the difficulties of technological governance,and provide specific ideas for innovative technological governance and optimization of technological autonomy.Methods Elaborate on the dilemma of medical technology governance in China,as simple de administration has not fully activated the conscious and autonomous vitality of medical institution technology governance;Analyze the possible reasons behind the dilemma.Results The main difficulties in governance include difficulty in autonomy,weak supervision,and limited innovation;Analyze the corresponding reasons for insufficient awareness,professional barriers,and structural tension.Conclusion Exploring the path of medical technology governance system from three aspects:activating autonomy,promoting technological innovation through technological governance,and establishing a governance system with multiple entities.The ideal form of technological governance is to shift the focus of technological governance to grassroots medical institutions at all levels and respond to the medical needs of the masses.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15