检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑琰 ZHENG Yan
机构地区:[1]北京大学社会学系
出 处:《中国农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第2期96-113,共18页Journal of China Agricultural University;Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目“乡村振兴背景下小农户融入现代经营体系的实践路径研究”(22CSH036)。
摘 要:农村集体地权的界定和治理是当前乡村振兴与城乡融合发展的核心议题之一。本文尝试在“产权的社会视角”基础上做进一步拓展,以阐明当代中国农村集体地权界定实践的理论逻辑。通过对珠三角地区两个相邻制造业重镇推行村级工业园改造政策过程中形成的“基层村庄主导的多元化产权形式”和“地方政府主导的单一化产权形式”两种地权界定结果差异的比较案例分析,本文认为,首先,地方政府与基层村庄围绕集体土地产权界定的博弈结果受到国家治理结构和村庄社会结构的影响。在地方分权的国家治理结构下,集体地权的界定结果取决于村庄社会结构的差异并通过呼吁机制发挥作用。其次,地方政府能够通过正式制度的调整形塑村庄治理结构,由此强化或削弱基层村庄的集体行动能力,最终对集体地权界定结果产生持续性的影响。最后,在城乡融合发展的政策背景下,东部发达地区应该更加尊重村集体和村民的土地权益,积极探索地方政府与村集体合作开展土地开发的新机制。The definition and governance of rural collective land rights are one of the core issues in current rural revitalization and urban-rural integration development.This article attempts to further expand on the“social perspective of property rights”to clarify the theoretical logic of rural collective land rights in contemporary China.Through a comparative case analysis of the differences in the results of defining land rights between the“diversified property right form dominated by grassroots villages”and the“single property right form dominated by local governments”formed during the implementation of the policy of renovating village-level industrial parks in two adjacent manufacturing towns in the Pearl River Delta,this article believes that:firstly,the game results between local governments and grassroots villages around the definition of collective land property rights are influenced by the national governance structure and village social structure.Under the decentralized national governance structure,the results depend on the differences in the social structure of villages and play a role through voice mechanisms.Secondly,local governments can shape the governance structure of villages through formal institutional adjustments,thereby strengthening or weakening the collective action capacity of grassroots villages,ultimately having a sustained impact on the results.Finally,this article emphasizes that under the policy background of urban-rural integration development,the eastern region should pay more attention to the land rights and interests of village collectives and villagers,and actively explore new mechanisms for local governments and village collectives to cooperate in land development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.169