服务贸易国内规制的国际治理:基于“良好监管实践”的视角  

International Governance of Service Domestic Regulation:From the Perspective of“Good Regulatory Practice”

作　　者：张磊[1] 徐琳[2] ZHANG Lei;XU Lin

机构地区：[1]上海对外经贸大学国际经贸研究所 [2]上海社会科学院经济研究所

出　　处：《国际经贸探索》2024年第2期106-120,共15页International Economics and Trade Research

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BJY016)。

摘　　要：国内规制作为影响服务贸易自由化的关键因素,面临扩大开放与维护主权间关系“两难”。从GATS到CPTPP、SDR等相关纪律,各类协定对服务监管透明度、可预期性及规范性要求不仅持续深化,同时还拓展出规制融合的新领域。虽然不同协定仍存在治理模式及手段的差异,但也呈现若干共性,更加体现“良好监管实践”特征是其中一项重要趋势。国际规则演进对中国创新服务贸易发展机制提出新要求,包括提升政策透明度,拓展利害关系人参与;稳定审批工作预期,深化“良治”改革;因应治理模式调整,完善监管评估制度。对此中国应结合履行SDR及积极申请加入CPTPP等情况,基于发展中国家立场定位,探索规制融合的协同路径与方式。Domestic regulation,as a key factor affecting the liberalization of trade in services,faces a dilemma between expanding opening up and defending sovereignty.From GATS to CPTPP,SDR and other related disciplines,various agreements not only continuously deepen the requirements for transparency,predictability and standardization of service regulation,but also expand new field of regulatory convergence.Although governance modes and means of different agreements are not the same,there are also several commonalities and to better reflect the characteristic of“good regulatory practice”is an important trend.The evolution of international rules puts forward new requirements for China's innovation of development mechanism of trade in services,including improving policy transparency and expanding the engagement of interested persons,stabilizing the expectation of approval work and deepening the reform of“good governance”,and optimizing regulation and assessment system according to the adjustment of governance mode.In this regard,China should combine the implementation of SDR and the active application to CPTPP to explore the collaborative paths and ways of regulatory convergence as a developing country.

关 键 词：服务贸易国内规制 规制融合 良好监管实践 

分 类 号：F744[经济管理—国际贸易]