检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵玉芬 王储一 蒋淑磊[4] 储博彦 ZHAO Yu-fen;WANG Chu-yi;JIANG Shu-lei;CHU Bo-yan(Hebei Academy of Forestry and Grassland Science,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050061,China;Hebei Forest City Construction Technology Innovation Center,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050061,China;Hebei Professional College of Political Science and Law,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050061,China;Shijiazhuang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences,Shijiazhuang,Hebei 050000,China)
机构地区:[1]河北省林业和草原科学研究院,河北石家庄050061 [2]河北省森林城市建设技术创新中心,河北石家庄050061 [3]河北政法职业学院,河北石家庄050061 [4]石家庄市农林科学研究院,河北石家庄050000
出 处:《河北林业科技》2023年第4期1-5,共5页Journal of Hebei Forestry Science and Technology
基 金:河北省重点研发计划现代种业科技专项(19226359D);中央引导地方科技发展资金项目——城市滞尘降污树种筛选及配置技术研究(216Z6301G)。
摘 要:该研究运用AHP层次分析法,从观赏特性及在石家庄地区的生长适应性等方面,对收集到的34个卫矛属植物品种进行综合评价。结果表明:参与评价的34个卫矛属植物品种分为3个等级,其中Ⅰ级(综合分值>3.2),综合利用价值最高,共有11个品种,具有观赏价值高,适应性强的特点;Ⅱ级(综合分值2.5~3.2):综合利用价值高,共21个品种,适应性强,但在某些观赏性方面欠缺;Ⅲ级(综合分值<2.5):综合利用价值一般,共2种,生长适应性、观赏性不如Ⅰ、Ⅱ级品种。In this study,analytic hierarchy process(AHP)was used to comprehensively evaluate the ornamental value of 34 varieties of Euonymus L.from ornamental characteristics and growth adaptability in Shijiazhuang area.The results showed that,there were three grades in these varieties.Grade I.(>3.2)including 11 varieties with high ornamental value and strong adaptability,and had good value in landscape application.There were 21 varieties in grade II(2.5~3.2),these varieties had strong adaptability in Shijiazhuang by contrast with their ordinary ornamental value.The grade III(<2.5)had 2 varieties,their comprehensive evaluation were lowest in the three grades.
分 类 号:S793[农业科学—林木遗传育种]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.218.109