破坏水生野生动物资源刑事案件的实证分析  

An Empirical Study on Criminal Cases of Destroying Aquatic Wildlife Resources

作　　者：李义松[1] 姚敏 LI Yi-song;YAO Min

机构地区：[1]河海大学法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2024年第1期24-33,共10页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

摘　　要：在生态文明建设的时代背景下,完善刑法对水生野生动物相关犯罪的惩治是野生动物保护的重要保障。我国《刑法》第151条、340条、341条对破坏水生野生动物资源犯罪进行了规定,《关于办理破坏野生动物资源刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》针对破坏野生动物资源犯罪的新情况和新问题,调整了破坏野生动物资源犯罪的定罪量刑标准。通过对2021—2022年相关样本进行分析发现,司法实践中仍存在刑法保护范围狭小、犯罪门槛降低、刑事处罚轻于行政处罚、缓刑适用率过高、无限额罚金制实务操作性不强、预防救济措施缺乏等问题。建议完善刑法对水生野生动物资源的保护体系,调整司法解释的相关规定,构建完整的刑罚适用体系,以期全链条惩治破坏水生野生动物资源犯罪,有力保护生态环境,维护生物多样性和生态平衡。Under the background of ecological civilization construction,improving the punishment of aquatic wildlife related crimes in criminal law is an important guarantee for wildlife protection.Articles 151,340 and 341 of the Criminal Law stipulate the crime of destroying aquatic wildlife resources,and the Interpretation on Several Issues concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of destroying Wildlife Resources adjusts the conviction and sentencing standards for crimes of destroying wildlife resources in view of new situations and problems of crimes of destroying wildlife resources.Through the analysis of the relevant samples in 2021 and 2022,it is found that there are still problems in judicial practice,such as narrow scope of criminal law protection,lower crime threshold,lighter criminal punishment than administrative punishment,too high application rate of probation,inapplicable fine amount model,and lack of preventive relief measures.It is suggested to improve the protection system of aquatic wildlife resources in the Criminal Law,adjust the relevant provisions of judicial interpretation,and build a complete penalty application system,so as to punish the crime of destroying aquatic wildlife resources in the whole chain,effectively protect the ecological environment,and maintain biodiversity and ecological balance.

关 键 词：水生野生动物资源 定罪量刑标准 刑罚适用体系 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]