交通肇事“逃逸”新论  

A New Theory of"Escape"for Traffic Accidents

作　　者：田硕 马荣春 TIAN Shuo;MA Rong-chun

机构地区：[1]南京航空航天大学法学院

出　　处：《江苏警官学院学报》2024年第1期121-128,共8页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute

摘　　要：交通肇事“逃逸”的内涵究竟是“逃避法律追究”还是“逃避救助义务”,学界并未形成一致意见。然而,这两者并非二元对立关系,其在解释方法上是同源的。因此,将它们结合起来形成“结合说”以揭示“逃逸”的内涵并无不妥。由此,不仅可以解决“肇事逃逸”法定刑升格的正当性问题,也回应了“逃避救助义务说”与司法解释有关“为逃避法律追究而逃跑”规定相违背的问题。“逃逸”情节的特殊性决定了“逃逸”只具有依附地位而无独立性,这意味着“逃逸”情节只影响对行为人的量刑。所以,在交通肇事的制度安排上,将“逃逸”作为定罪情节违反了禁止重复评价原则,相关规定应予以删除。There is no consensus in the academic community on whether the connotation of"escape"in traffic accidents is"evading legal prosecution"or"evasion of rescue obligations".The relationship between the two is not binary opposition,and the interpretation method of the two is homologous.Therefore,it is not inappropriate to combine the two to form a"combination theory"to reveal the connotation of"escape".The understanding of"escape"not only solves the problem of the legitimacy of the statutory penalty upgrade of"hit-and-run"but also responds to the problem that the theory of evasion of rescue obligations is contrary to the provision of"flight to evade legal prosecution"in the Interpretation.The particularity of the"escape"plot requires that the"escape"only has a dependent status and no independence.Since"escape"is not independent,that is,it only affects the sentencing of the perpetrator.Therefore,in the institutional arrangement of traffic accidents,using"escape"as a convicted circumstance violates the principle of prohibiting duplicate evaluation,so the relevant provisions should be deleted.

关 键 词：交通肇事 逃逸 逃避法律追究说 逃避救助义务说 结合说 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]