盆底功能障碍性疾病患者血清miR-4429和miR-19-3p水平表达及临床价值研究  

Expression and Clinical Value of Serum miR-4429 and miR-19-3p in Patients with Pelvic Floor Dysfunctional Disease

作　　者：张莹莹 梁琛[2] 李晓燕[2] 张艳玲 酒卫莉 ZHANG Yingying;LIANG Chen;LI Xiaoyan;ZHANG Yanling;JIU Weili(Department of Neurourology,the Second People’s Hospital of Hengshui,Hebei Hengshui 053000,China;Obstetrics and Gynecology,the Second People’s Hospital of Hengshui,Hebei Hengshui 053000,China)

机构地区：[1]衡水市第二人民医院神经泌尿外科,河北衡水053000 [2]衡水市第二人民医院产科,河北衡水053000

出　　处：《现代检验医学杂志》2024年第2期119-123,共5页Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine

基　　金：衡水市科技计划项目任务书(2019014015Z):不同分娩方式对产妇盆底功能障碍性疾病的影响和康复训练的临床研究。

摘　　要：目的探究盆底功能障碍性疾病(pelvic floor dysfunctional disease,PFD)患者血清微小RNA(microRNA,miR)-4429和微小RNA(microRNA,miR)-19-3p水平表达及意义。方法选取2021年6月~2022年6月衡水市第二人民医院收治的PFD患者90例作为PFD组,分为盆腔器官脱垂(pelvic organ prolapse,POP)组(n=50)、压力性尿失禁(stress urinary incontinence,SUI)组(n=25)和POP并发SUI组(n=15);并选取同期在衡水市第二人民医院检查的健康女性80例为对照组。比较对照组与PFD组分娩方式、既往流产史、PFD家族史等一般资料。比较各组血清miR-4429和miR-19-3p水平。受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线分析血清miR-4429,miR-19-3p水平对PFD的诊断价值。Logistic回归分析影响PFD的因素。配对样本t检验比较PFD治疗前后血清miR-4429,miR-19-3p水平变化。结果PFD组在分娩方式、既往流产史、PFD家族史方面与对照组相比差异均有统计学意义(t=4.415,6.444,4.707,均P<0.05)。PFD组血清miR-4429水平较对照组降低(0.71±0.19 vs 1.00±0.25),miR-19-3p水平较对照组升高(1.44±0.35 vs 1.01±0.28),差异具有统计学意义(t=8.927,8.772,均P<0.05)。POP组和SUI组血清miR-4429水平高于POP并发SUI组(0.73±0.22,0.74±0.16 vs 0.59±0.16),POP组和SUI组血清miR-19-3p水平低于POP并发SUI组(1.35±0.39,1.41±0.31 vs 1.77±0.56),差异具有统计学意义(t=3.531,3.411;5.003,3.865,均P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析显示,miR-4429,miR-19-3p可辅助评估是否发生PFD的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.805,0.825,二者联合检测的AUC为0.865。多因素分析显示,miR-19-3p是影响PFD的危险因素,miR-4429是保护因素。经过治疗发现,PFD患者血清miR-4429水平升高(0.93±0.23 vs 0.71±0.19),miR-19-3p水平降低(1.12±0.29 vs 1.44±0.35),差异具有统计学意义(t=6.996,6.679,均P<0.05)。结论PFD患者血清miR-4429水平降低,miR-19-3p水平升高,血清miR-4429,miR-19-3p水平与PFD疾病的发生发展密切相关,可�Objective To investigate the expression and significance of microRNA(miR)-4429 and microRNA(miR)-19-3p level in patients with pelvic floor dysfunctional(PFD)disease.Methods A total of 90 PFD patients admitted to the Second People’s Hospital of Hengshui from June 2021 to June 2022 were selected as the PFD group.They were grouped into the pelvic organ prolapse(POP)group(n=50),the stress urinary incontinence(SUI)group(n=25),and the POP combined with SUI group(n=15).Meanwhile,80 healthy women who were examined in the Second People’s Hospital of Hengshui were collected as the control group.The general data such as delivery mode,previous abortion history and family history were compared between the control group and the PFD group.The levels of serum miR-4429 and miR-19-3p in each group were compared.The diagnostic value of serum miR-4429 and miR-19-3p levels in PFD was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analysis.Logistic regression analysis was applied to analyze the factors affecting PFD.The paired sample t-test was applied to compare the changes in serum miR-4429 and miR-19-3p levels before and after PFD treatment.Results There were significant differences between the PFD group and the control group in terms of delivery mode,previous abortion history,and PFD family history,and the differences were statistically significant(t=4.415,6.444,4.707,all P<0.05).The serum miR-4429(0.71±0.19 vs 1.00±0.25)level in the PFD group was lower than that in the control group,while the miR-19-3p(1.44±0.35 vs 1.01±0.28)level was higher than that in the control group,and the differences was statistically significant(t=8.927,8.772,all P<0.05).The serum miR-4429(0.73±0.22,0.74±0.16 vs 0.59±0.16)level in the POP and SUI groups was higher than that in the POP combined SUI group,while the serum miR-19-3p(1.35±0.39,1.41±0.31 vs 1.77±0.56)level in the POP group and SUI group was lower than that in the POP combined with SUI group,with significant differences(t=3.531,3.411;5.003,3.865,all P<0.05).ROC analysis showed

关 键 词：盆底功能障碍性疾病 微小RNA-4429 微小RNA-19-3p 

分 类 号：R711.5[医药卫生—妇产科学] R392.11[医药卫生—临床医学]