检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马振坤 刘永泽 张立秋 封莉[1,2] 杜子文 MA Zhen-kun;LIU Yong-ze;ZHANG Li-qiu;FENG Li;DU Zi-wen(Beijing Key Lab for Source Control Technology of Water Pollution,College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;Engineering Research Center for Water Pollution Source Control&Eco-remediation,College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China)
机构地区:[1]北京林业大学环境科学与工程学院水体污染源控制技术北京市重点实验室,北京100083 [2]北京林业大学环境科学与工程学院污染水体源控制与生态修复技术北京市高等学校工程研究中心,北京100083
出 处:《中国给水排水》2024年第5期63-68,共6页China Water & Wastewater
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(52070014)。
摘 要:以实际污水厂二级出水为处理对象,对比不同臭氧曝气方式(微气泡曝气和常规曝气)对污水中有机物的去除效果,同时考察微气泡对臭氧传质以及自由基产生的强化能力。连续流动态实验结果表明,微气泡曝气(气泡直径d=10~150μm)与常规曝气(d>1 mm)分别在30和40 mg/L臭氧投量下达到最佳处理效果(COD<5 mg/L),此时O_(3)/COD(表征去除单位COD所需臭氧量)值分别为1.3和2.2,微气泡曝气可以显著降低处理成本。静态实验结果表明,当臭氧投量为3 mg/min时,微气泡曝气在5 min内可去除90.6%的COD,而常规曝气的去除率仅为75.4%。同时发现,反应过程中微气泡曝气的臭氧利用率达到100%,远高于常规曝气;微气泡曝气使臭氧传质系数从0.176 kmol/(m^(3)·h)提高到0.335 kmol/(m^(3)·h),·OH产量较常规曝气提高了1.9倍。This paper compared the performances of different ozone aeration modes(microbubble aeration and conventional aeration)for removing organic matters from secondary effluent of a wastewater treatment plant,and investigated the ability of microbubbles for enhancing ozone mass transfer and hydroxyl radical generation.The continuous flow dynamic experiment results showed that the optimal treatment performances(effluent COD less than 5 mg/L)of microbubble ozonation(bubble diameter of 10-150μm)and conventional ozonation(bubble diameter greater than 1 mm)were obtained when the dosage of ozone was 30 mg/L and 40 mg/L respectively,and the O_(3)/COD values(the amount of ozone per unit COD consumption)were 1.3 and 2.2,respectively,indicating that microbubble aeration significantly reduced the treatment cost.The static experiment results showed that the microbubble ozonation removed 90.6%COD within 5 min when the ozone dosage was 3 mg/min.In contrast,the COD removal rate of conventional ozonation was only 75.4%.In addition,the ozone utilization rate of microbubble aeration reached 100%,which was much higher than that of conventional aeration.The microbubble aeration increased the ozone mass transfer coefficient from 0.176 kmol/(m^(3)·h)to 0.335 kmol/(m^(3)·h),and the yield of·OH increased by 1.9 times compared to conventional aeration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15