检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林承铎[1] LIN Cheng-duo(International College,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2024年第1期51-58,共8页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:定牌加工出口为我国十分重要的产业发展方向,海关系统也对知识产权提供边境执法保护。然而,假使境外委托方并未在我国境内进行商标注册,并且在我国境内却由第三人拥有该商标专用权,则我国境内受托方定牌加工的行为将可能产生侵权疑虑。在平衡境内商标权利人的权利保护及促进定牌加工制造业发展间,应找出一个平衡点,但长期以来,司法裁判观点历经数次变动与海关执法存在一定的逻辑矛盾,使得相关争议一直存在,因此,明确请求权基础才能把问题从根本上解决,也才能平衡我国加工出口产业的发展及商标权保护。Original Equipment Manufacture(OEM)export is a very important industrial development direction in China,and the customs system also provides border enforcement protection for intellectual property rights.However,if the overseas entrusting party has not registered the trademark in China,and the third party has the exclusive right to use the trademark in China,the behavior of the domestic manufacturer may have the suspicion of infringement.In balancing the protection of the rights of domestic trademark owners and promoting the development of OEMs,we should find a balance point acceptable to both sides.However,for a long time,there has been a certain logical contradiction between the judicial judgment viewpoint and the customs law enforcement after several changes,which has led to the existence of relevant disputes.Therefore,only by clarifying the basis of claim may we fundamentally solve the problem and balance the development of China's OEM export industry and the protection of trademark rights.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.147.87