论我国算法解释权的构建——以公安领域为例  

On the Construction of Algorithm Interpretation Rights in China-Taking the Public Security Field as an Example

作　　者：郭雨婷 GUO Yuting(Administrative Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学行政法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《中国人民警察大学学报》2024年第4期37-44,共8页Journal of China People's Police University

摘　　要：算法的运用有效提升了公安执法的效率,但不透明的人工智能决策机制易引发算法权力滥用风险,亟须提升算法透明度,以实现可信、规范化公安数字执法。欧盟《通用数据保护条例》的发布引发了学界对算法解释权的争论,算法解释权对于公安机关数字执法透明度与可信度的提升以及监督和治理具有重要意义,且具有法律与技术双重层面的可行性。《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》等规范为构建我国算法解释权提供了深厚的土壤,但有待进一步完善与体系化。应以我国现有算法解释权的法律渊源为基础,立足算法模型,从算法解释权的主体、适用范围、解释标准、解释内容及配套机制方面构建我国算法解释权。The use of algorithms has effectively improved the efficiency of public security law enforcement,but the opaque artificial intelligence decision-making mechanism is easy to cause the risk of abuse of algorithm power,and it is urgent to improve the transparency of algorithms to achieve credible and standardized public security digital law enforcement.The release of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation has triggered a debate in the academic circles on the right to interpret algorithms,which is of great significance to the transparency and credibility of digital law enforcement and the supervision and governance of public security organs,and has the feasibility of both legal and technical aspects.China’s Personal Information Protection Law and other norms provide a deep soil for the construction of China’s algorithm interpretation rights,but need to be further improved and systematized.Based on the legal source of China’s existing algorithm interpretation right,based on the algorithm model,China’s algorithm interpretation right should be constructed from the subject,scope of application,interpretation standards,content and time of interpretation of algorithm interpretation right.

关 键 词：算法解释权 算法解释 机器学习 算法模型 数字公安 

分 类 号：D631[政治法律—政治学] D912.1[政治法律—中外政治制度]