论法官造法之路标  

On the Signposts of Judge-made Laws

作　　者： 李剑(译) Karl Larenz;Li Jian

机构地区：[1]不详 [2]中南林业科技大学政法学院

出　　处：《法治社会》2024年第2期112-126,共15页Law-Based Society

摘　　要：法官法的存在及其合理性已得到了普遍的认可,但法官法并不是任意而为的。为了防止法官在法律适用活动中的恣意性,法官法需要受到一定的限制,同时也需要加以指引。拉伦茨教授认为“事物本质”“案例比较”“学说发展”“原则和准则”以及“法律理念”都是法官法需要遵循的“路标”。这些路标在法官进行法律裁判时以不同的方式发挥着作用。通过这五项路标,我们可以将法官法限定在一个合理的范围内,使其符合我们的法体系以及法秩序。The existence of the law of judges and its rationality have been universally recognized,but the law of judges is not arbitrary.In order to prevent judges from being arbitrary in the application of the law,the law on judges needs to be subject to certain restrictions,and at the same time,it also needs to be guided.Larenz believes that“the essence of things”,“case comparison”,“doctrinal development”,“principles and guidelines”and“legal philosophy”are all“signposts”that need to be followed by the law of judges.These road signs function in different ways when judges adjudicate their laws.Through these five signposts,we can limit the law of judges to a reasonable range and make it conform to our legal system and legal order.

关 键 词：法官法 法教义学 法理念 新黑格尔主义 

分 类 号：D916.2[政治法律—法学]