检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐克前[1] 章玲玲 朱燕[1] 黄建军[1] 王晓春[1] XU Keqian;ZHANG Linging;ZHU Yan;HUANG Jianjun;WANG Xiaochun(Department of Laboratory Medicine,the Third Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Department of Laboratory Medicine,Xiangya School of Medicine,Central South University,Changsha 410013,China)
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅三医院临床检验学教研室,中南大学湘雅医学院医学检验系,长沙410013
出 处:《生命的化学》2024年第2期363-368,共6页Chemistry of Life
基 金:教育部医学检验技术一流本科专业建设点项目。
摘 要:合作学习是当今世界一种主流的教学理论和教学方法。本研究探讨讲授式教学和合作学习在医学检验技术专业临床生物化学检验课程中的应用效果。选取中南大学医学检验技术专业127名2018级和2019级本科生为研究对象,将讲授式教学作为对照组,合作学习作为实验组。采用学生主体评价模式、29个评价指标对两种教学方法进行评价。用Pearson相关进行两组间学生成绩相关性分析,用t检验比较两组间差异。结果显示,对照组和实验组的成绩分别为(72.6±9.3)分和(92.0±4.5)分,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。Pearson相关分析结果显示,成绩呈正相关,相关系数r=0.46。学生评价课程的29个满意度指标中,有26个指标实验组的得分高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义。其他3个指标实验组的得分高于对照组,但是差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05)。总之,合作学习有助于提升学生的高阶认知能力,并增加教师和学生对教学的投入。Collaborative learning is a dominant teaching theory and methodology in today's world.To explore the effect of collaborative learning and lecture-based learning in the course of Clinical Biochemistry Tests in the major of medical laboratory sciences,127 undergraduates in Central South University enrolled in the year 2018 and 2019 were selected as research objects.Lecture-based learning and collaborative learning were regarded as control and experimental groups,respectively.29 student-centered items were used for evaluating the quality of teaching and learning of lecture-based learning and collaborative learning.Pearson correlation was used for analysis of student performance correlation between the two groups.Differences between the two groups were compared with unpaired t test.Our results showed that the scores of the control group and experimental group were(72.6±9.3)and(92.0±4.5),respectively.The difference has a statistical significance(P<0.001).Pearson correlation analysis showed that the score of collaborative learning was positively correlated with that of lecture-based learning(r-0.46).Of the 29 student satisfaction items,the scores of 26 items of the experimental group were higher than that of the control group,the difference has statistical significance.The other 3 items were also higher than that of the control group,however,the difference has no statistical significance(P>0.05).All these data indicates that collaborative learning can help students improve higher-order cognition skills,and increase student engagement and teacher engagement.
关 键 词:合作学习 讲授式教学 高阶认知 学生投入 教师投入
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] R-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.7.195