检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:安寿志 李纪龙 AN Shouzhi;LI Jilong(AnJie Broad Law Firm(Xiamen)Office,Xiamen 361013,China)
机构地区:[1]北京安杰世泽(厦门)律师事务所,福建厦门361013
出 处:《体育科学研究》2024年第1期16-19,共4页Sports Science Research
摘 要:我国新修订《体育法》增设体育仲裁,构建起中国特色体育仲裁制度,为体育纠纷提供新的纠纷解决途径,对仲裁独立性与一裁终局等仲裁基础原则的确认、扩张性的体育仲裁意思自治原则和体育仲裁特别程序方面对我国的仲裁制度做出了创新和有益补充。通过与日本体育仲裁制度的对比分析,我国体育仲裁制度可进一步发挥仲裁独立性、根据需求调整扩大体育仲裁范围、加强体育仲裁与行业内部纠纷解决机制衔接、适当公开体育仲裁裁决,更加有效贯彻“及时、公正解决体育纠纷,保护当事人合法权益”这一立法宗旨,促进我国体育仲裁的发展。China s newly revised Sports Law set up sport arbitration regime with Chinese characteristics,provides a new way to resolve sports disputes,makes innovative and beneficial supplements to China s arbitration system in terms of the adoption of the principles of arbitration independence and the finality of arbitration,the expanded principle of autonomy of will of sports arbitration and the special procedures of sports arbitration.Through the analysis with the Japanese sports arbitration system,China s sports arbitration can further present the independence of arbitration,adjust the scope of sports arbitration according to practice,strengthen the connection between sports arbitration and the internal dispute resolution mechanism,and properly publish sports arbitration award,so as to more timely and fair settlement of sports disputes,to protect the rights and interests of the parties and to promote the development of sports arbitration in China.
分 类 号:G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.125