检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:布占廷 吴亚静 Bu Zhanting;Wu Yajing
机构地区:[1]青岛大学外语学院 [2]北京科技大学外国语学院
出 处:《西安外国语大学学报》2024年第1期46-52,共7页Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学一般项目“大学生学术英语写作反馈机制研究”(项目编号:20YJC740066)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:互动元话语是实现学术语篇中作者与读者互动,建构作者身份的重要资源。然而,现有研究多从第一人称代词等自我指称方式着手,探讨作者身份建构问题,缺乏对其他互动元话语资源及其建构具体身份类型的系统考察。鉴于此,本文力图建立一个作者身份的互动元话语建构综合框架。首先,在Hyland(2005a)已有分类的基础上,从功能视角对互动元话语分类进行梳理和拓展,在精密阶上往前推进一步。其次,在已有作者身份分析框架的基础上,从语用视角探讨互动元话语资源与作者身份建构的关系。由此建立的综合框架具有系统性、易量化特征,为作者身份的互动元话语建构研究提供了有益参照。Interactional metadiscourse is a set of important resources to realize the interaction between authors and readers and to construct authorial identities in academic discourse.However,most of the current studies focus on self-mentions,such as first-person pronouns,to discuss the authorial identity construction,ignoring a systematic investigation of specific types of authorial identities constructed by other interactional metadiscourse resources and their subcategories.In view of this,this study aims to establish a comprehensive analytical framework of interactional metadiscoursal construction of authorial identity.Firstly,this study further reviews and expands the classification of interactional metadiscourse of Hyland(2005a)from a functional perspective,which makes a step forward in the delicacy.Secondly,this study explores the relationship between interactional metadiscourse and authorial identity construction from the pragmatic perspective based on the existing authorial identity frameworks.Therefore,the framework constructed in this study has the characteristics of systematicness and easy-quantification,which provides a useful reference for researches on the interactional metadiscoursal construction of authorial identity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15