网络平台轴辐协议的认定路径  

The Identification Path of Network Platform Hub-and-Spoke Conspiracy

作　　者：张骏 彭添雅 ZHANG Jun;PENG Tian-ya

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院上海司法研究所,上海201701 [2]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2024年第2期64-78,共15页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

摘　　要：网络平台轴辐协议是国际反垄断领域的新兴话题,基于平台网络性和轴辐协议隐蔽性的双重特点,它的危害程度远胜传统轴辐协议。为了顺应数字经济的发展,我国在《反垄断法》和《关于平台经济领域的反垄断指南》中引入了轴辐协议制度。传统轴辐协议的诸多理论在平台最惠国待遇条款及算法共谋等情形下无法适用,致使平台轴辐协议的认定受阻。我国可以借鉴美国和欧盟的相关经验来构建平台轴辐协议的反垄断认定路径:明晰平台轴辐协议“实质性帮助”的具体内涵;确定平台轴辐协议适用可抗辩违法推定规则;修正平台轴辐协议的主客观要件理论;完善平台轴辐协议反竞争效果的抗辩规则。The platform hub-and-spoke conspiracy is a new topic in the international antitrust field.Because of the network nature of the platform and the concealment hub-and-spoke conspiracy,the platform hub-and-spoke conspiracy causes more serious harm to the economy than the traditional one.In order to adapt to the development of the digital economy,China has introduced the hub-and-spoke conspiracy system in the Anti Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China(2022 Amendment)and the Guidelines of the Anti Monopoly Commission of the State Council for Anti Monopoly in the Field of Platform Economy.However,many traditional theories cannot be applied in the situations of algorithmic collusion and platform MFN clauses,which hinders the identification of platform hub-and-spoke conspiracy.We should construct an antitrust path of identifying platform hub-and-spoke conspiracy by drawing on the relevant experiences of the United States and EU:Firstly,clarify the specific connotation of“substantive assistance”;Secondly,determine the application of the rebuttable rule of illegal presumption to the platform hub-and-spoke conspiracy;Thirdly,revise subjective and objective theories of the platform hub-and-spoke conspiracy.Fourthly,improve the defense rules for the anti-competitive effect of platform hub-and-spoke conspiracy.

关 键 词：平台轴辐协议 平台最惠国待遇条款 算法共谋 实质性帮助 

分 类 号：D912.29[政治法律—民商法学]