检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟鸿飞 万劲波 白光祖 陈春 王强 李燕 王唯滢 MENG Hongfei;WAN Jinbo;BAI Guangzu;CHEN Chun;WANG Qiang;LI Yan;WANG Weiying(Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou 730000,China;Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School of Public Policy and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;China Research Institute for Science Popularization,Beijing 100081,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院,兰州730000 [2]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190 [3]中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京100049 [4]中国科普研究所,北京100081
出 处:《科技导报》2024年第3期27-35,共9页Science & Technology Review
基 金:中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院前沿探索计划项目(E2X1611Z)。
摘 要:总结了美国国家研究理事会的咨询选题机制与研究组织机制及流程特点,发现美国国家研究理事会的咨询选题多为复合型,主要集中在行为与社会科学、生物学和生命科学、计算机和信息技术、冲突和安全等方面,在服务美国国家需求、布局优先事项及消除种族歧视等多个方面发挥了有效作用;结合具体选题案例,对战略政策型、前瞻储备型和应急焦点型选题进行了分析。对智库研究选题和组织的启示为:一是聚焦国家需求,回应社会关切;二是拓展国际合作,发出中国声音;三是注重科学传播,倡导科学价值;四是规范研究过程,确保客观可信;五是创新智库方法,提高研究效率。This paper summarizes the consultative topic selection mechanism of the National Research Council of the United States and the characteristics of the research organization mechanism and process.Most of the consultative topic selections of the National Research Council of the United States are compound,mainly concentrated on behavioral and social sciences,biology and life sciences,computer and information technology,conflict,security,etc.The mechanism has played an effective role in serving America's national needs,laying out priorities,and eliminating racial discrimination.Combined with specific topic selection cases,the strategic policy type,prospective reserve type,and emergency focus type topic selections are analyzed.Finally,several enlightenments for Chinese think tank research topic selection and organization are presented.First,we should focus on national needs,respond to social concerns.Second,we should expand international cooperation and make China's voice heard.Third,we should pay attention to science communication and advocate the value of science.Fourth,we should standardize the research process to ensure objectivity and credibility.Fifth,we should innovate think tank methods and improve research efficiency.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.5.237