三分法视域中的荀子人性论诠释与辨正  

Interpretation and Differentiation of Xunzi's Theory of Human Nature from the Perspective of Trisection

作　　者：姚海涛 Yao Haitao

机构地区：[1]青岛城市学院马克思主义学院

出　　处：《国际儒学论丛》2023年第2期76-91,291,292,共18页International Tribune of Confucian Studies

摘　　要：三分法作为与二分法并立的哲学研究范式,将之引入对荀子及其人性论的研究具有天然的合法性。因为三分法既契合荀子思想内在逻辑机理,又与学界荀子诠释范式选择的“集体无意识”相吻合。三分法视域中的荀子人性论有两大维度:纵向的时间历史维度与横向的学理逻辑维度。其一,从纵向的时间历史维度看,三分法能够完整地再现从汉唐、宋明至清代的荀子人性论认知史,即基本肯定、全面否定到否定之否定的三个连续交织的思想史阶段。其二,从横向的学理逻辑维度看,三分法可将荀子人性分为欲恶之性、辨知之性、积伪之性三个连续上升的哲理蕴谓层次。辨正与贞定意义上的横向学理三分法对于破除以往或误读荀子之“伪”,或囿于“性恶”之名,或泯灭荀子人性论独立价值的各种论调,较好地解决荀子人性论之争,继承拓展中国哲学三分研究范式,具有一定学术意义。Xunzi's theory of human nature has two dimensions:a vertical dimension of time and history,a horizontal dimension of academic logic.First,from the vertical dimension of time and history,trisection can completely reproduce the cognitive history of Xunzi's theory of human nature from Han and Tang Dynasties,Song and Ming Dynasties to Qing Dynasty.Second,from the horizontal dimension of academic logic,trisection can divide Xunzi's human nature into three continuously rising philosophical connotations,namely,nature of likes and dislikes,distinguishment of the nature of wisdom,artificial nature.It is of certain academic significance to get rid of all kinds of arguments that misread Xunzi's“Wei”,or were confined to the name of“Xing E”,or devoid of the independent value of Xunzi's theory of human nature,to better solve the dispute of Xunzi's theory of human nature,and to inherit and expand the research paradigm of trisection of Chinese philosophy.

关 键 词：三分法 荀子 欲恶之性 辨知之性 积伪之性 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]