纠驳杜注,发掘隐微:龟井南冥、龟井昭阳的《春秋》学  

Powerful Arguments against the Notes by Du Yu:A Study on Kamei Nammyeong and Kamei Akiyo's Annotation of Spring and Autumn Annals

作　　者：张德恒 Zhang Deheng

机构地区：[1]山东理工大学文学与新闻传播学院

出　　处：《国际儒学论丛》2023年第2期136-159,292,共25页International Tribune of Confucian Studies

基　　金：2018年度国家社会科学基金青年项目“日本德川时期的中国《春秋》学研究”(项目编号:18CZW032)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：德川日本晚期(1780~1852),古文辞学派儒者龟井南冥、龟井昭阳研探《春秋》经传,深入研究《左传》,注重从文章文法的角度,整体上观照传文,通过对传文叙述脉络的发掘梳理,阐释传文中的疑难问题,从而实现“经传相发”,明确经传文意。龟井南冥《春秋左传考义》致力于反驳、纠正杜注,龟井昭阳《左传缵考》继承家学,在反驳、纠正杜注的基础上,努力探求传文隐含的微言大义,构建“文学现场”,极大地丰富并生动了传文。由于二书刊刻时间较晚,故对德川晚期及幕末日本《春秋》学影响并不广泛。但是它们却比较深刻、广泛地影响到日本明治(1868~1912)、大正(1912~1926)乃至昭和(1926~1989)年间的日本《春秋》学,其著作质量、学术价值,借此可窥一斑。In the late Tokgawa era,Kamei Nammyeong and Kame Akiyo had researched commentaries of Spring and Autumn Aunnals,along with a deep research into The Commentary of Zuo.Kamei Nammyeong wrote An Examination of The Commentary of Zuo,making powerful arguments against the notes by Du Yu.Kame Akiyo wrote The Inheritance of The Examination,which inherited the research achievements of his father,based on the examination and rectification of notes by Du Yu,to make efforts to covert meanings and build the literary situation,resulting in enriching the notes of Spring and Autumn Annuals.Because of the late issuing time,these two books had little influence on the study of Spring and Autumn Annals in the late Tokgawa era,but they had a great influence on the study in Meji era,Taishou era and Showa era.

关 键 词：龟井南冥 龟井昭阳 杜注 《春秋左传考义》 《左传缵考》 

分 类 号：I20[文学—中国文学]