危险作业罪中“现实危险”的判断方案——以体系性和类型性思维切入  

The Judgment Scheme for“Actual Danger”in the Crime of Dangerous Operations——Starting With Systematic and Typological Thinking

作　　者：魏勤泉 WEI Qin quan(East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200042,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学刑事法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2024年第3期68-71,共4页Journal of Harbin University

基　　金：2022年度上海市哲学社会科学规划课题,项目编号:2022ZFX004;2022年度华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资金资助项目,项目编号:2022-3-028。

摘　　要：“现实危险”的准确认定是判断危险作业行为是否构成危险作业罪的关键,应围绕“现实危险”的基本特征构建判断体系。在判断体系中,现实性无需单独审查,应以重大性和紧迫性的判断为核心。在判断标准上,应从事后查明的全部客观事实出发,以一般人的生活经验法则为基准。在方案设计上,应以类型性思维区分“事故型”案件和“状态型”案件,差异化构建“现实危险”判断方案。The accurate identification of“actual danger”is the key to determining whether a dangerous operations behavior constitutes the crime of dangerous operations.A judgment system should be constructed around the basic characteristics of“actual danger”.In this system,the reality need not be examined separately;instead,the focus should be on the judgment of significance and urgency.As for the judgment standard,it should start from all the objective facts established after the event,using the general rule of thumb in everyday life as a benchmark.In terms of scheme design,differentiated approaches should be taken to distinguish between“accident type”cases and“state type”cases,and to construct differentiated judgment schemes for“actual danger”.

关 键 词：危险作业罪 现实危险 判断标准 重大性 紧迫性 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]