检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张欢 ZHANG Huan(The Institute of Qing History,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出 处:《吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2024年第2期26-34,共9页Journal Of Jilin Normal University:Humanities & Social Science Edition
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(17JJD770013)。
摘 要:“旗民界限”视角在清代满汉关系研究中备受重视,但学界对于“旗民界限”的性质存在重大争议。在“不分满汉,但问旗民”这一话语的影响下,一些学者惯于从“二元对立”的角度出发来理解“旗民界限”。然而,大量研究表明“旗民界限”的性质不是“二元对立”——在某些情况下甚至是“二元合一”的。在辨析各种观点基础上,笔者提出反思“旗民界限”视角的若干进路,以飨学界同仁。The“bannerman-commoner boundary”perspective is highly regarded in the study on the relationship between Manchu and Han in the Qing Dynasty,but scholars debate over the nature of the“ban⁃nerman-commoner boundary.”Influenced by the discourse of“differentiating between bannermen and com⁃moners,rather than between Manchus and Han,”some scholars are accustomed to a“dualistic”viewpoint of the“bannerman-commoner boundary.”However,many studies have demonstrated that the nature of“bannerman-commoner boundary”is far from being“dualistic”-it can be even“dyadic”under some cir⁃cumstances.After analyzing various viewpoints,the author contributes to the existing scholarship by propos⁃ing several approaches of re-thinking the“bannerman-commoner boundary”perspective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.128.29.244